On 4/15/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Kostis Anagnostopoulos wrote:
> > Do you all agree i should drop the 2 ?
> >
> > I use javax.jaxb/jaxb-XXX libs.  Those are included in ibiblio but
> > without the actual jar.
>
> That is what I was afraid of...and what I meant by a licensing issue.
>
> > It just gives you a site to download.
> > Practically it means that in order to run it, you need to have installed 
> > the lib
> > in your local repo, or use an own remote repo.
>
> Yep...not a big deal, but you probably need to build out your maven site
> explaining this.

Ok, i'll add these instructions...on Monday.

Currently JAXB 1 plugin uses JAXB version 1.0.6 wich uses CDDL.
Until someone uploads these libs to the ibiblio directly, these
instructions are necessary.

     ankostis

PS: Its yet not clear to me whether i should setup a new JIRA issue
with the code.

>
> >
> >     ankostis
> >
> > On 4/15/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> the last revision - 1.0.5, I think - was relicensed CDDL.
> >>
> >> We already have an xjc plugin in the sandbox. It seems unmaintained, so
> >> we can probably replace it with this. I'd prefer jaxb1-maven-plugin
> >> (drop the 2, they are all maven2 plugins).
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> Jeff Genender wrote:
> >>> Yes...that was with my Apache hat on ;-)  Sometimes I get confused.
> >>>
> >>> - Jeff
> >>>
> >>> Wayne Fay wrote:
> >>>> Well if his plugin simply calls the Sun jars, and does not include
> >>>> them, then it would be up to the Maven User as to whether or not they
> >>>> could comply with the Sun license and thus use the Jaxb1 plugin. This
> >>>> jaxb1 pom would need to include those Sun jars as dependencies and
> >>>> then it would be up to the user to go download them from Sun directly
> >>>> and install manually into their local or corporate repo.
> >>>>
> >>>> So I don't see this as any good reason to keep this plugin off the
> >>>> Codehaus site etc. ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Wayne
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/14/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Whats the licensing on the Sun jars for 1.0?  That may be a slight 
> >>>>> problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know they changed them to CDDL for 2.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kostis Anagnostopoulos wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi to all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have made a Maven2 plugin for JAXB 1.0 compile based on the JAXB 2.0
> >>>>>> plugin, hosted on mojo.codehaus.org.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If there is interest (i.e. requirement for JAXB under 1.4 java), i can
> >>>>>> upload the code to mojo.codehaus.org.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Here are the nomenclature i intend to use:
> >>>>>>     groupId: org.codehaus.mojo
> >>>>>>     artifactId: jaxb1-maven2-plugin
> >>>>>>     url: http://mojo.codehaus.org/jaxb1-maven2-plugin/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I can give more details about the plugin if required, feel free to ask
> >>>>>> me.  Me myself have some question about i.e, the proper artifact id,
> >>>>>> and such.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have not write access to svn repository so i will need direction on
> >>>>>> how to accomplish such a task, if desired.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     Anagnostopoulos Kostis
>

Reply via email to