Hi Anders,

I agree with you that it would be useful to have a consistent groupId and so I 
shall now make the change. I shall change the dev guidelines accordingly.

Anything else before I bother you again? 

Kind regards,
Christopher

On 19/08/2011, at 4:01 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:

> Reading your updates to the dev guide lines I've now found a new
> reason to say -1 for the time being. I think that any plugin here at
> Mojo should use org.codehaus.mojo as the groupId, but I'm perfectly
> happy to change my mind if other people thinks otherwise. The reason
> would be for the plugin to be found automatically by Maven from
> command line when specifying its short name.
> 
> Anyone else's comment on this?
> 
> /Anders
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 07:26, Christopher Hunt <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Anders/Robert,
>> 
>> I've now done what you've requested and ask if you would mind voting once 
>> more. I've also updated the Mojo site doco to reflect the naming convention 
>> guidelines (http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/guidelines.html - first few 
>> bullet points).
>> 
>> The plugin's new URL is http://mojo.codehaus.org/jslint-maven-plugin/
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Christopher
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> 
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to