Hi Dan, shouldn't vfs be something like wagon-extra?What is your idea what will
happen once commons-vfs is released? I cannot imagine they'll make a
maven-plugin as part of their release (that would be the first
commons-project).As you mentioned yourself: the packaging is now confusing, but
that all depends on the future of this plugin.IMO codehaus shouldn't be used as
a kickoff area if you're sure that this is not the final destination of the
plugin. Robert > Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:35:58 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mojo-dev] Re: Intention to promote and release vfs-maven-plugin
> beta 1 and its sub components
>
> ping,
>
> Looks like no objection on proceeding to release vfs-smb at codehaus :-)
>
> -D
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After a few months of testing internally, I would like to proceed with
> > the first beta release. However, I would like to open a discussion on
> > distribution of vfs-smb which is a fork from apacche's commons-vfs's
> > sandbox. This provider passes all of the generic test suite ( except
> > 2 related to classloader, may related to osgi requirements ), the
> > provider will not be release any time soon either.
> >
> > So I would like release vfs-smb at codehaus, keep the same java
> > package name, until commns-vfs officially release it
> >
> > Any objection for me do so, otherwise please provide alternative solution
> >
> > big thanks ahead
> >
> > -Dan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>