So what is the verdict here?, Is it  ok to release my vfs-smb together
with svn-maven-plugin at codehaus until commons-vfs promote it.  Let's
user test this out, that is why we call it beta.
I dont see any ramification here

and I do like the idea to campaigning commons-vfs to accept it and I
would volunteer to maintain it there. But that is another long journey

Thanks

-D

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let me rephrase this a bit:
> I think what happened to the tomcat-maven-plugin is a good thing: let the
> developers of the framework/webcontainer/tool/etc. maintain their own Maven
> plugin.
> Most of the time you want to keep these in sync.
> For instance: we're having quite some trouble to follow the pace of GWT.
> To me your situation looks similar to the tomcat-situation.
>
> About the wagon-extra: I thought the vfs-project is about InputStreams and
> OutputStreams, just like the Wagon-project. But I can be wrong here.
>
> Robert
>> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:55:15 +0200
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Re: Intention to promote and release
>> vfs-maven-plugin beta 1 and its sub components
>
>>
>> > Are you suggesting me to move the entire vfs-maven-plugin to github?
>> > I am not ready to go there yet, this is where I comfortable with for
>> > years
>> > and feedbacks and helps here are great.
>>
>> No. I was just saying that Mojo shouldn't be used just to get some jar
>> to central. But it's a good place for a plugin that could be of
>> interest for other people.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > -Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> I'm with Robert here. If you're just looking for some area to do
>> >> releases from you should start your own Github account and use
>> >> Sonatype OSSRH for syncing to central.
>> >>
>> >> /Anders
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Scholte
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Dan,
>> >>>
>> >>> shouldn't vfs be something like wagon-extra?
>> >>> What is your idea what will happen once commons-vfs is released? I
>> >>> cannot
>> >>> imagine they'll make a maven-plugin as part of their release (that
>> >>> would be
>> >>> the first commons-project).
>> >>> As you mentioned yourself: the packaging is now confusing, but that
>> >>> all
>> >>> depends on the future of this plugin.
>> >>> IMO codehaus shouldn't be used as a kickoff area if you're sure that
>> >>> this is
>> >>> not the final destination of the plugin.
>> >>>
>> >>> Robert
>> >>>> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:35:58 -0700
>> >>>> From: [email protected]
>> >>>> To: [email protected]
>> >>>> Subject: [mojo-dev] Re: Intention to promote and release
>> >>>> vfs-maven-plugin
>> >>>> beta 1 and its sub components
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ping,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Looks like no objection on proceeding to release vfs-smb at codehaus
>> >>>> :-)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -D
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>> > Hello,
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > After a few months of testing internally, I would like to proceed
>> >>>> > with
>> >>>> > the first beta release. However, I would like to open a discussion
>> >>>> > on
>> >>>> > distribution of vfs-smb which is a fork from apacche's
>> >>>> > commons-vfs's
>> >>>> > sandbox. This provider passes all of the generic test suite (
>> >>>> > except
>> >>>> > 2 related to classloader, may related to osgi requirements ), the
>> >>>> > provider will not be release any time soon either.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > So I would like release vfs-smb at codehaus, keep the same java
>> >>>> > package name, until commns-vfs officially release it
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Any objection for me do so, otherwise please provide alternative
>> >>>> > solution
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > big thanks ahead
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > -Dan
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>
>> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >
>> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to