Hi, I am also in the Rcpp core team. Rcpp11 is a reimplementation of Rcpp using C++ 11 features. However, it lacks some features we used in MXNet R pacakge.
Best, KK On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Felix Cheung <[email protected]> wrote: > On a related note, Rcpp, used extensively in the R package, is GPLv2/GPLv3 > licensed. > > I'm not aware of any other R package available that supports R<->C++. > > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x > https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcpp/index.html > > _____________________________ > From: Henri Yandell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 11:23 PM > Subject: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet > To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected] > >> > > > One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache MXNet is > removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies. > > ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static > compiling. > > They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't made > much progress, though they did relicense JeroMQ (Java > wrapper/implementaiton) last year. > > In the last few months they've made a lot of progress towards relicensing: > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE > > I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to continue > using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend > towards MPL 2.0. > > Any concerns before I do so? > > Thanks, > > Hen > > > -- Qiang Kou [email protected] School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University
