I think that the goals are really quite different. But I don't know about Artemis very much.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Why not explore the use of Apache Artemis as an alternative? > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 7/5/17, 11:23 PM, "Henri Yandell" <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache > MXNet is > removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies. > > ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static > compiling. > > They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't > made > much progress, though they did relicense JeroMQ (Java > wrapper/implementaiton) last year. > > In the last few months they've made a lot of progress towards > relicensing: > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE > > I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to > continue > using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend > towards MPL 2.0. > > Any concerns before I do so? > > Thanks, > > Hen > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
