"- 0"

I believe the bug #11849
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849>, unable to import
non-fp32 models into Gluon, fixed in this PR #12412
<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412> is important for the
users. I would rather pick this fix in this release than plan a minor
release later.

Best,
Sandeep



On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:34 PM Philip Cho <chohy...@cs.washington.edu>
wrote:

> Actually, the command "git clone --recursive
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet -b 1.3.0.rc0" works fine now,
> never mind.
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM Philip Cho <chohy...@cs.washington.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, MXNet was depending on a branch of TVM that is now
> deleted.
> > We will have to merge #12448
> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12448> before the
> release.
> >
> > Background: See dmlc/tvm#1394 <https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/1394>.
> >
> > Philip.
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:26 AM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Checked out the tag, built and tested the Clojure package. +1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 10:59 PM Roshani Nagmote <
> >> roshaninagmo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I would like to propose a vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating)
> >> version
> >> > 1.3.0.RC0. Voting will start now (Friday, Aug 31st) and end at 7:00 PM
> >> > PDT, Wednesday, Sept 5th.
> >> >
> >> > Link to release notes:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases
> >> >
> >> > Link to release candidate 1.3.0.rc0:
> >> > *https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.3.0.rc
> >> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.3.0.rc0>0*
> >> >
> >> > View this page, click on "Build from Source", and use the source code
> >> > obtained from 1.3.0.rc0 tag:
> >> > https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html
> >> >
> >> > Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> >> >
> >> > +1 = approve
> >> > +0 = no opinion
> >> > -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Roshani
> >> >
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Sandeep Krishnamurthy

Reply via email to