Hey,
After having my PR vetted and reviewed by some contributors, I would like
to move forward into the stage of putting this into production. I am asking
for MXNet committers to take a look at my PR regarding the Label Bot.
https://github.com/MXNetEdge/mxnet-infrastructure/pull/15. This will also
require access for a webhook - let's set this into motion. Thanks.

Best,
-Harsh

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:05 PM Piyush Ghai <ghai.piy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Harsh,
>
> Good job! This is super cool! Especially bringing down the response time
> to under 20 seconds.
>
> Thanks,
> Piyush
>
>
> > On Oct 15, 2018, at 3:49 PM, Qing Lan <lanking...@live.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Harsh,
> >
> > This new label bot design looks great! I would like to encourage people
> to review it and move forward to benefit the MXNet community.
> > Since this new design needs webhook support from Apache, let's go
> through the following steps to get this done:
> >
> > 1. Demo and contributors review stage: all contributors are encouraged
> to review the PR here:
> > https://github.com/MXNetEdge/mxnet-infrastructure/pull/15 and leave
> your thoughts so Harsh can apply them in his design.
> > 2. Committers review stage: Once all contributors think the design is
> good to go, let's get committers involved to get a review.
> > 3. Committers send request to Apache Infra to get the webhook setup.
> > 4. Harsh finally deploy the model and all of us can use it in
> incubator-mxnet repo!
> >
> > Some fun fact I would like to share:
> > 1. This new bot can recommend labels and reply to people who file it!
> > 2. It response time from 5mins -> less than 20 seconds
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Qing
> >
> > On 10/15/18, 11:11 AM, "Harsh Patel" <harshpatel081...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >    Hey,
> >    I have a demo available that users and developers can play around
> with --
> >    this is in regards to the post I had made regarding the updated label
> bot
> >    functionality. This is available on my fork (
> >    https://github.com/harshp8l/incubator-mxnet) if the developers would
> be
> >    able to provide feedback that would be great.
> >    The updated usage of this label bot:
> >    To add labels: @mxnet-label-bot, add ['label1', 'label2']
> >    To remove labels: @mxnet-label-bot, remove ['label1', 'label2']
> >    To update labels: @mxnet-label-bot, update ['label3', 'label4']
> >    (warning: with update - this will remove all other labels for a
> specific
> >    issue and update only with the labels the user specifies). Thanks.
> >
> >    My PR for reference:
> >    https://github.com/MXNetEdge/mxnet-infrastructure/pull/15
> >
> >    My Design:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Machine+Learning+Based+GitHub+Bot
> >
> >    Best,
> >    -Harsh
> >
> >    On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:54 AM Hagay Lupesko <lupe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >> Thanks for the contribution!
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:41 AM kellen sunderland <
> >> kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Awesome work!  Many thanks.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 1:19 AM Harsh Patel <harshpatel081...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey,
> >>>> I am looking to contribute to MXNet. I have a working implementation
> >>> based
> >>>> on my proposed design structure according to this wiki page (
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Machine+Learning+Based+GitHub+Bot
> >>>> )
> >>>> - under 7.
> >>>> I have provided users with functionality allowing for adding,
> updating,
> >>> and
> >>>> deleting labels for our issues. The response time with the bot to
> >> provide
> >>>> the aforementioned functionality has been reduced as well. Users
> should
> >>>> expect speedy updates to labels based on requests made to the label
> >> bot.
> >>>> The total number of GitHub API calls have been further reduced as well
> >>>> preventing potential bottlenecks that could result from GitHub.
> >>>> I would like to have a webhook for this repo:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet so that this functionality
> >>> will
> >>>> be used and tested by the developers here. Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> -Harsh Patel
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to