Chris, Is there are rewording that you would find more acceptable? Again, we can have more time to edit and revise the document. There is not a time limit on this. I might have been too hasty to start the vote thinking the discussion was wrapped up.
- Carin On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:50 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> wrote: > or another example if something is downvoted, this also implies that after > a vote is over, it’s approprorate to continue pushing the subject trying to > just wear everyone down even though the outcome is clear. We’ve seen this > before, actually. > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > -1 “strive to meet consensus”? This seems to imply the consensus is the > > natural expected state. So in the case where someone submits that we > should > > start a nuclear war, then our bylaws would state that we should all try > to > > agree to start a nuclear war. > > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi Carin: > >> Sorry for the last minute request, but given the way we write down > the > >> PMC, committer privileges, I feel we need to add an additional line: > >> > >> - "PMC/committer should strive to be diplomatic and reach consensus > >> with > >> discussion when possible." > >> > >> Since I don't really want us to give an impression of abusing veto > >> rights. > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Tianqi > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > This vote is to adopt the document > >> > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal > >> > to replace the current document > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer > >> > > >> > The dev discussion thread is here > >> > > >> > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E > >> > > >> > The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined > >> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> > > >> > Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule > >> unless > >> > otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than > >> > unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- > regardless > >> of > >> > the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems > too > >> > small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is > >> typically > >> > not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus > >> > <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a > >> > modifying factor.) > >> > > >> > The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Carin > >> > > >> > > >
