May be we can adopt this. https://struts.apache.org/bylaws.html#voting
> On Oct 29, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Chris, > > Is there are rewording that you would find more acceptable? Again, we can > have more time to edit and revise the document. There is not a time limit > on this. I might have been too hasty to start the vote thinking the > discussion was wrapped up. > > - Carin > >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:50 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> or another example if something is downvoted, this also implies that after >> a vote is over, it’s approprorate to continue pushing the subject trying to >> just wear everyone down even though the outcome is clear. We’ve seen this >> before, actually. >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 5:41 PM Chris Olivier <cjolivie...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> -1 “strive to meet consensus”? This seems to imply the consensus is the >>> natural expected state. So in the case where someone submits that we >> should >>> start a nuclear war, then our bylaws would state that we should all try >> to >>> agree to start a nuclear war. >>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Carin: >>>> Sorry for the last minute request, but given the way we write down >> the >>>> PMC, committer privileges, I feel we need to add an additional line: >>>> >>>> - "PMC/committer should strive to be diplomatic and reach consensus >>>> with >>>> discussion when possible." >>>> >>>> Since I don't really want us to give an impression of abusing veto >>>> rights. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Tianqi >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:47 PM Carin Meier <carinme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This vote is to adopt the document >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Become+an+Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+Committer+and+PPMC+Member+Proposal >>>>> to replace the current document >>>>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Becoming+a+Committer >>>>> >>>>> The dev discussion thread is here >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e61ffa26af374de7a99c475d406e462a00b26cfc1155e232198dd53e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be a procedural issue vote as defined >>>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>>> >>>>> Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule >>>> unless >>>>> otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes than >>>>> unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- >> regardless >>>> of >>>>> the number of votes in each category. (If the number of votes seems >> too >>>>> small to be representative of a community consensus, the issue is >>>> typically >>>>> not pursued. However, see the description of lazy consensus >>>>> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus> for a >>>>> modifying factor.) >>>>> >>>>> The vote will run until Friday Nov 2nd at 6:00 am EST >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Carin >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
