I think you need admin permissions on both repos to do that which might be problematic. Since it looks like there is just one recent open issue, can you replicate it on the main MXNet repo and have a link to the original issue?
FWIW - When the Clojure package joined the main repo. I just put instructions on the main page to open issues against the main repo instead https://github.com/gigasquid/clojure-mxnet - Carin On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 9:13 AM iblis <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> wrote: > just found that I don't have the permission to transfer issues of > dmlc/MXNet.jl. > Could anyone help me on this? > > On 1/7/19 12:16 PM, iblis wrote: > > okay. > > Before disabling the issue tracker, I'm going to transfer the issue > > from MXNet.jl to main repo. > > (via > https://help.github.com/articles/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository/ > ) > > > > On 1/7/19 12:17 AM, Chris Olivier wrote: > >> +1 for disabling issue tracker and putting a note on original repo (if > it > >> isn’t already there) that work/issue tracking has moved to mxnet (using > >> julia label in github or Jira). m > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 1:19 AM iblis <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> wrote: > >> > >>> Before PR #10149 got merged (Oct 5, 2018) into main repo, > >>> julia code is developed and maintained in the separate repo -- > >>> dmlc/MXNet.jl. > >>> > >>> After that PR, there are no further development happened in > dmlc/MXNet.jl. > >>> We work with the main repo now. > >>> But the original MXNet.jl repo is still there, it just isn't deleted or > >>> archived yet. > >>> I receive some issue ticks from this repo occasionally, > >>> maybe we should just disable the issue tracker of it. > >>> > >>>> Does it work with other frameworks other than mxnet? > >>> hmm, I'm not sure what you mean. > >>> > >>> On 1/6/19 1:18 PM, Chris Olivier wrote: > >>>> Curious: Why is the julia code maintained in a separate repo? I was > >>> under > >>>> the impression that it was donated/permanently merged into the mxnet > >>> source > >>>> tree. Does it work with other frameworks other than mxnet? > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:32 PM Iblis Lin <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> If there is trademark issue, how about this option: > >>>>> 3) transferring the MXNet.jl repo ownership from DMLC to Apache. > >>>>> > >>>>> On 1/6/19 6:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1) Reuse the old repo: https://github.com/dmlc/MXNet.jl > >>>>>>> It's under DMLC. I have the committer bit of this repo. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm not 100% sure that would be allowed from a branding/trademark > >>>>> perspective, any distribution owned by a 3rd party can't be called > >>> "Apache > >>>>> MXNet". > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2) A new repo under ASF's organization? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That seems preferable I think. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Justin > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Iblis Lin > >>>>> 林峻頤 > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Iblis Lin > >>> 林峻頤 > >>> > >> > > > > -- > Iblis Lin > 林峻頤 >
