Yes, I have them on main repo.
But for MXNet.jl, I'm repo collaborator.
Anyway, I'm browsing the issues and migrating some of them.
On 1/8/19 12:46 AM, Chris Olivier wrote:
Do you not have write permissions on mxnet repo?
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:13 AM iblis <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
just found that I don't have the permission to transfer issues of
dmlc/MXNet.jl.
Could anyone help me on this?
On 1/7/19 12:16 PM, iblis wrote:
okay.
Before disabling the issue tracker, I'm going to transfer the issue
from MXNet.jl to main repo.
(via
https://help.github.com/articles/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository/
)
On 1/7/19 12:17 AM, Chris Olivier wrote:
+1 for disabling issue tracker and putting a note on original repo (if
it
isn’t already there) that work/issue tracking has moved to mxnet (using
julia label in github or Jira). m
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 1:19 AM iblis <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
Before PR #10149 got merged (Oct 5, 2018) into main repo,
julia code is developed and maintained in the separate repo --
dmlc/MXNet.jl.
After that PR, there are no further development happened in
dmlc/MXNet.jl.
We work with the main repo now.
But the original MXNet.jl repo is still there, it just isn't deleted or
archived yet.
I receive some issue ticks from this repo occasionally,
maybe we should just disable the issue tracker of it.
Does it work with other frameworks other than mxnet?
hmm, I'm not sure what you mean.
On 1/6/19 1:18 PM, Chris Olivier wrote:
Curious: Why is the julia code maintained in a separate repo? I was
under
the impression that it was donated/permanently merged into the mxnet
source
tree. Does it work with other frameworks other than mxnet?
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:32 PM Iblis Lin <ib...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw>
wrote:
If there is trademark issue, how about this option:
3) transferring the MXNet.jl repo ownership from DMLC to Apache.
On 1/6/19 6:45 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
1) Reuse the old repo: https://github.com/dmlc/MXNet.jl
It's under DMLC. I have the committer bit of this repo.
I'm not 100% sure that would be allowed from a branding/trademark
perspective, any distribution owned by a 3rd party can't be called
"Apache
MXNet".
2) A new repo under ASF's organization?
That seems preferable I think.
Thanks,
Justin
--
Iblis Lin
林峻頤
--
Iblis Lin
林峻頤
--
Iblis Lin
林峻頤
--
Iblis Lin
林峻頤
