Yes, to secretary@. Do you need a template? Thanks Sheng
Mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for offering help. I can represent the code donors and file the > software grant. Should the filing go to secretary@? > > Sheng > > > On Jul 5, 2020, at 9:50 AM, Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Is this being tracked in a ticket anywhere? What help can I offer? > > > > Mike > > > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:44 PM Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sheng, > >> > >> since this is a "large one off code contribution", the policy [1] states > >> that they should be brought in through a software grant. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Marco > >> > >> [1]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works/legal.html > >> > >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> To mentors, > >>> > >>> Do we the PPMC need to fill out IP clearance for this code donation? > >>> > >>> -sz > >>> > >>> On 2019/04/24 21:19:49, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> The community has agreed to donate mshadow to the mxnet code base. I > >>> will start the migration and build logic changes soon. > >>>> > >>>> -sz > >>>> > >>>> On 2019/04/07 21:47:39, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> I agree it would make development easier to donate mshadow to mxnet > >>> code base, since mshadow is only used in MXNet. I support donating the > >>> mshadow code to mxnet and I started an RFC for this in mshadow [1]. > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://github.com/dmlc/mshadow/issues/373 > >>>>> > >>>>> -sz > >>>>> > >>>>> On 2019/04/06 04:38:19, Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > >>>>>> Technically, mshadow is sufficient for MXNet. Adopting other > >>> libraries ( > >>>>>> eigen or xtensor) will unnecessarily increase the codebase complexity > >>>>>> without any additional gains. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Given that mshadow is only used by mxnet. I do support donating it > >>> into > >>>>>> mxnet codebase. > >>>>>> To respect the original mshadow community. I would recommend > >>> starting a > >>>>>> community RFC In the mshadow github issue for a week, before we > >>> start the > >>>>>> migrating process. > >>>>>> Also, I would recommend a rebase merge just like the case of > >>> MXNet.jl code > >>>>>> base to preserve the contribution history. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tianqi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM Alfredo Luque > >>>>>> <alfredo.lu...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Do you have a link to both of these proposals? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 20:14 Anirudh Acharya < > >>> anirudhk...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been > >>> discussions > >>>>>>>> about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> As a more long term solution using libraries like eigen to > >>> perform linear > >>>>>>>> algebra operations was also suggested by anirudh2290@. I think > >>> xtensor( > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/QuantStack/xtensor ) can also be a candidate > >>> here. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> - > >>>>>>>> Anirudh > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy < > >>>>>>> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Some developers have noticed that working in mshadow is > >>> cumbersome as > >>>>>>>>> it's a 3rdparty subrepo. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Since mshadow is a bunch of headers which don't have much of > >>>>>>>>> independent tests / library functionality, me and other > >>> developers > >>>>>>>>> believe that it would be good to assimilate this code in the > >>>>>>>>> repository for ease of contribution and changes without having > >>> to go > >>>>>>>>> trough contortions to test PRs that modify mshadow. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Would anybody oppose this change? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks and have a nice weekend. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Pedro. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>
