I found the template in the link Marco provided and filed the software grant to the secretary.
Sheng On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 10:09 AM Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes, to secretary@. Do you need a template? > > Thanks Sheng > > Mike > > On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for offering help. I can represent the code donors and file the > software grant. Should the filing go to secretary@? > > > > Sheng > > > > > On Jul 5, 2020, at 9:50 AM, Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Is this being tracked in a ticket anywhere? What help can I offer? > > > > > > Mike > > > > > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:44 PM Marco de Abreu < > marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Sheng, > > >> > > >> since this is a "large one off code contribution", the policy [1] > states > > >> that they should be brought in through a software grant. > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Marco > > >> > > >> [1]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works/legal.html > > >> > > >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:41 PM Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> To mentors, > > >>> > > >>> Do we the PPMC need to fill out IP clearance for this code donation? > > >>> > > >>> -sz > > >>> > > >>> On 2019/04/24 21:19:49, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> The community has agreed to donate mshadow to the mxnet code base. I > > >>> will start the migration and build logic changes soon. > > >>>> > > >>>> -sz > > >>>> > > >>>> On 2019/04/07 21:47:39, Sheng Zha <zhash...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>>> I agree it would make development easier to donate mshadow to mxnet > > >>> code base, since mshadow is only used in MXNet. I support donating > the > > >>> mshadow code to mxnet and I started an RFC for this in mshadow [1]. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] https://github.com/dmlc/mshadow/issues/373 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -sz > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 2019/04/06 04:38:19, Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> > wrote: > > >>>>>> Technically, mshadow is sufficient for MXNet. Adopting other > > >>> libraries ( > > >>>>>> eigen or xtensor) will unnecessarily increase the codebase > complexity > > >>>>>> without any additional gains. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Given that mshadow is only used by mxnet. I do support donating it > > >>> into > > >>>>>> mxnet codebase. > > >>>>>> To respect the original mshadow community. I would recommend > > >>> starting a > > >>>>>> community RFC In the mshadow github issue for a week, before we > > >>> start the > > >>>>>> migrating process. > > >>>>>> Also, I would recommend a rebase merge just like the case of > > >>> MXNet.jl code > > >>>>>> base to preserve the contribution history. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Tianqi > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:25 PM Alfredo Luque > > >>>>>> <alfredo.lu...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Do you have a link to both of these proposals? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 20:14 Anirudh Acharya < > > >>> anirudhk...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi Pedro, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> mshadow is mostly used for tensor arithmetic. There have been > > >>> discussions > > >>>>>>>> about including it within mxnet. I think it is a good idea. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> As a more long term solution using libraries like eigen to > > >>> perform linear > > >>>>>>>> algebra operations was also suggested by anirudh2290@. I think > > >>> xtensor( > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/QuantStack/xtensor ) can also be a candidate > > >>> here. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>> Anirudh > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 7:03 PM Pedro Larroy < > > >>>>>>> pedro.larroy.li...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Hi > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Some developers have noticed that working in mshadow is > > >>> cumbersome as > > >>>>>>>>> it's a 3rdparty subrepo. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Since mshadow is a bunch of headers which don't have much of > > >>>>>>>>> independent tests / library functionality, me and other > > >>> developers > > >>>>>>>>> believe that it would be good to assimilate this code in the > > >>>>>>>>> repository for ease of contribution and changes without having > > >>> to go > > >>>>>>>>> trough contortions to test PRs that modify mshadow. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Would anybody oppose this change? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks and have a nice weekend. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Pedro. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> >
