+1
Tested:
- Make flow building from source: example/extensions all work correctly
- staticbuild flow cpu & cu102 variants with custom extension library
Sam
On 7/12/20, 1:52 PM, "Marco de Abreu" <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
Okay, thanks for the clarification!
-Marco
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 5:58 PM Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Since the license issues apply to binary distribution, we should still be
> able to make official source releases.
>
> Regards,
> Sheng
>
> > On Jul 12, 2020, at 1:10 AM, Marco de Abreu <marco.g.ab...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Are we in the position to make a release given that we have open license
> > issues with the ipmc and Apache board? I want to avoid giving the
> > impression that we are ignoring their requests - my current
understanding
> > is that we are non compliant.
> >
> > -Marco
> >
> >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2020, 9:46 AM Tong He <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> My +1 on the R binding.
> >>
> >> Tested with
> >>
> >> - Build from source
> >> - Install the R package and check it passed all tests.
> >>
> >>> On 2020/07/10 18:31:27, Patrick Mu <zm2...@columbia.edu> wrote:
> >>> Hi Ciyong,
> >>>
> >>> I just discovered an issue with the 1.7, which causes the Yolo
training
> >> with latest Gluon CV Yolo to fail.
> >>>
> >>> The PR that causes the failure is
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/18358, which modifies
> >> basic blocks of Gluon to fix a memory leak issue.
> >>>
> >>> Talked with Leonard, the author of the PR, and he said he found the
> root
> >> cause, but patching that PR would modifies those Gluon basic blocks
> >> further, which might be risky towards existing models and various
> customer
> >> models.
> >>>
> >>> So my 2-cents is reverting this PR in 1.7, and try patching the PR in
> >> 1.x and 2.0, meaning that the 1.7 won't have memory usage optimized by
> that
> >> feature.
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to hear what you think about this issue.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ziyi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2020/07/10 06:18:02, "Chen, Ciyong" <ciyong.c...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Community,
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to call for action to test/validate/vote for the release
> >> candidate (1.7.0.rc0)
> >>>> As there's not any voting result during the scheduled time window, I
> >> would like to extend the time windows to July 13, 23:59:59 PST.
> >>>> Please prepare your time and provide feedback if you've tried with
the
> >> pre-release code bases, thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Ciyong
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.c...@intel.com>
> >>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:48 PM
> >>>> To: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> >>>> Cc: Bob Paulin <b...@apache.org>; Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>;
> >> Jason Dai <jason...@apache.org>; Markus Weimer <wei...@apache.org>;
> >> Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version
> 1.7.0.rc0
> >>>>
> >>>> For the language bindings and windows platform, may I have your
> >> support to help verify these features? Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> @lanking520 to help verify the Scala/Java @gigasquid to help verify
> >> the Clojure
> >>>> @hetong007 to help verify the R
> >>>> @yajiedesign to help verify the windows platform
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Ciyong Chen
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Chen, Ciyong <ciyong.c...@intel.com>
> >>>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:39 PM
> >>>> To: d...@mxnet.apache.org
> >>>> Cc: Bob Paulin <b...@apache.org>; Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>;
> >> Jason Dai <jason...@apache.org>; Markus Weimer <wei...@apache.org>;
> >> Michael Wall <mjw...@apache.org>
> >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.rc0
> >>>>
> >>>> Dear MXNet community,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.7.0.
> >> Voting will start July 6, 23:59:59 PST and close on July 9, 23:59:59
> PST.
> >>>>
> >>>> Link to release notes:
> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/1.7.0+Release+notes
> >>>>
> >>>> Link to release candidate:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.7.0.rc0
> >>>>
> >>>> Link to source and signatures on apache dist server:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.7.0.rc0<
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.7.0.rc0/>
> >>>>
> >>>> Please remember to TEST first before voting accordingly:
> >>>> +1 = approve
> >>>> +0 = no opinion
> >>>> -1 = disapprove (provide reason)
> >>>>
> >>>> Additional notes:
> >>>>
> >>>> * There was an issue and discussion[1] regarding on a few numpy
> >> operators failed due to numpy 1.19.0 released on Jun 20, 2020, which
> exists
> >> in all branches (works with numpy <= 1.18.5). As numpy operator is
> still an
> >> experimental feature in 1.7.0 release and mainly targeting in MXNet 2.0
> >> release, so I decided to not block the voting and instead let the
> Community
> >> decide whether this is a blocker for the release.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/18600
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Ciyong Chen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
