+1 for a meta decision ;)
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-) > Oh, I love recursive self-references :-) > > Manfred > > Heath Borders schrieb: > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:44:07 +0100, Martin Marinschek > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>+1 > >> > >>regards, > >> > >>Martin > >> > >> > >>On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:21:22 -0700, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Hi All, > >>> > >>>I'd like to propose that we use the same process that Tomcat uses; > >>> > >>>http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html > >>> > >>>As you can read in the copied thread below this is one of the last > >>>remaining items before we become a top level project (cool!) so we need > >>>to nail this down RSN. > >>> > >>>I believe all we have to do is point to this page (correct Ted?) > >>> > >>>Thoughts? > >>> > >>>TTFN, > >>> > >>>-bd- > >>> > >>>On Jan 7, 2005, at 3:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>>We mentioned applying for TLP in the proposal. So, if that's > >>>>>what we still want, then yes. > >>>>> > >>>>>Unless, of course, there is another TLP that you would like > >>>>>to join instead. > >>>>> > >>>>>Personally, I think the scope is broad enough to justify its > >>>>>own project. > >>>> > >>>>Yes, think so too. So with a TLP myfaces.apache.org, there is > >>>>enough room for subprojects like you guys to with Struts. > >>>> > >>>>One candiate will be perhaps the WML RenderKit > >>>>and the extra components. (the TilesViewHandler one I'd like > >>>>to see inside of tiles.apache.org -Yes I saw your draft on > >>>>that) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Ok, we have to *convert* the documentation etc into forrest xml > >>>>>> stuff, that should be added to http://incubator.apache.org/myfaces/ > >>>>> > >>>>>Of course, you know that Forrest is not a *requirement*. You > >>>>>can use anything you like. > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm not sure about PHP though. We'd have to check with > >>>>>infrastructure. There's an inclination to have the sites end > >>>>>up as HTML, to minimize server load. > >>>> > >>>>Since I got a basic knowledge of forrest and since it is > >>>>usable from ANT, I think forrest will be fine. Also the > >>>>current homepage is based upon forrest, so why not continue. > >>>> > >>>>At weekend I will try to convert some docs from myfaces.org > >>>>to our page. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>I didn't mean that I added, only that, if it were me, I'd > >>>>>make it a status "page" rather than a status "file". > >>>>> > >>>>>You might just add a "Status" page to the Community tab. A > >>>>>"Roadmap" page might do as well. What the checklist says is: > >>>>> > >>>>>" (Committers, non-incubation action items, project resources, etc)" > >>>>> > >>>>>There are Incubator PMC members who do insist that projects > >>>>>have a "status file", so we need to make sure this is handled somehow. > >>>> > >>>>Ok, I try... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>> that looks very *generic* but why the mention of Struts inside of > >>>>>> ibatis? > >>>>> > >>>>>Oops, typo. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>> I need to lookup some historical dates for the Incubator status > >>>>>>> page, but we seem otherwise good to go. > >>>>> > >>>>>I slacked on the dates and just updated the page in > >>>>>Subversion to say "DONE", but haven't published it yet. > >>>>> > >>>>>As far as TODOs go, what's left are the "decision making guidelines". > >>>>> > >>>>>-Ted. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > > >
