almost all ;) wendy pointed out more detailed, what I was thinking about :)
On 8/23/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, but that's a far cry from Matze's "for all commits". For all major enhancements, I'm absolutely d'accord. regards, Martin On 8/23/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I really don't see the necessity for MyFaces committers to do all > > extensions of MyFaces through jira, if sufficient communication has > > happened on the developer list first. > > > > Why do you think that opening a jira-issue and adding patches will > > make us more efficient in the development process? > > Patches from committers don't need to go through JIRA, but IMO there > ought to be an issue corresponding to every major change in > functionality or addition. > > Commit messages that clearly explain what is being added or changed, > and that refer to a JIRA issue, make life much easier when trying to > track down problems, construct release notes, or just learn about the > codebase. > > -- > Wendy > -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
-- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
