Same as Cagatay. Current head should be stable enough!
There was no big change last weeks in tomahawk. Due to using latest tom in a current app i can admit that there seem to be no new issues. Gerald On 2/23/07, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, +1 for throwing away 1.1.4, creating a new branch using current trunk and releasing 1.1.4. Cagatay On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok folks, I will try to start the release process for tomahawk next week. > > Well, regarding the branch there are various possibilities: > - use the already existing 1.1.4 branch from Nov. 2006 and release 1.1.4 > - throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new branch and release 1.1.4 > - (optionally) throw away existing 1.1.4 branch, create new 1.1.5 > branch, skip version number 1.1.4 and release 1.1.5 > > If we use one of the two "create new branch" strategies, which > revision is stable enough. Current head? > > Thanks, > Manfred > > > > On 2/22/07, Jeff Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 on this idea. > > > > Tomahawk has settled down since the Dojo move and has been running > > relatively stable. Best to ensure the next release is branched sometime > > before any more big changes. (Tomahawk 1.1.4 RC is very good too) :) > > > > Paul Spencer wrote: > > > We just completed a MyFaces 1.1.5 release, which resolved blockers > > > related to Tomahawk. Can we get a Tomahawk release done before we start > > > changing things for Fusion? > > > > > > > > > Paul Spencer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
-- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
