+1a! Bruno
On 23/04/2008, Sochor Zdeněk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 for (a) > > and for component class generation: > > Annotated class is a private class that is used as template (never > instantiated, just the code is copied inside the generated class) > > (to not lose typeof checking in deeper trees - using abstract class in the > middle would lose it for generated classes) > > The question then is with 2nd level classes (names based on used ones in > example): > > /** > * @JSFComponent * class = > "org.apache.myfaces.component.ComponentInLowerLevel" > * superClass = "org.apache.myfaces.component.Component" //The superClass > is a different class > **/ > class _AbstractComponentInLowerLevel extends _AbstractComponent > > or > > /** > * @JSFComponent * class = > "org.apache.myfaces.component.ComponentInLowerLevel" > * superClass = "org.apache.myfaces.component.Component" //The superClass > is the same class > **/ > class _AbstractComponentInLowerLevel extends Component > > ??? > (should be 1st option) > > And as a side-note: only few classes in examples are in new generator > style > > Regards, > Zdenek > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] napsal(a): > > > Werner Punz schrieb: > > > > > > > +1 definitely for jsf 1.1 we need something > > > working and well documented. > > > > > > > > > > Just to be clear: the options for the next core-1.1and tomahawk releases > > are: > > (a) the new myfaces-builder-plugin > > (b) the myfaces-faces-plugin (formerly called trinidad-faces-plugin) as > > currently used in trinidad/core-1.2.x > > (c) stay with the current solution. > > > > Info about approach (a) can be found here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyfacesBuilderPlugin > > > > Background on the whole issue (including a description of "the current > > solution") can be found here: > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation > > > > This vote is specifically about whether to choose (a) or not. > > > > Choosing (a) means updating source in core-1.1 and tomahawk-1.1 trunk to > > add javadoc annotations to the source code. Hence the vote, to make sure > > everyone is happy for that to be done. > > > > Werner, did you mean +1 for (a) or something else? > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > > > > > >
