On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: > >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Volker Weber schrieb: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Leonardo has just deleted the EnumConverter from the jsf1.1 branch of >>>> commons. >>>> This converter was the reason for me to use a snapshot version in our >>>> production application. >>>> >>>> Is it really necessary to have the commons jsf1.1 branch java 1.4 >>>> compatible? >>>> I know jsf1.1 is, but commons is an extension, so why should we >>>> restrict commons? >>>> >>>> We may provide a retroweaved (if this is possible with this Converter) >>>> release for 1.4 users, as we do for tobago. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I think we really *should* have commons-1.1 compatible with java1.4. >>> >>> >> >> I think that this is not necessary. Trinidad 1.0.x (which is the JSF >> 1.1 version) >> supports only Java5. >> >> >> >>> Setting up retroweaver, etc. is a pain in the butt. So if *you* (Volker) >>> can >>> provide a clean and simple patch to get this working, fine. But otherwise >>> I'm happy with removing EnumConverter from commons1.1. >>> >>> >> >> just because of JSF 1.1 uses outdated Java version? >> >> > I may have spoken too soon. > > For myfaces core 1.1.x I think we should definitely stay with "-source 1.4 > -target 1.4" options. There won't be a whole lot of people running it on > java1.4, but we currently support it so should stay with it. > > I guess that commons-1.1.x *could* be run by different rules. It is new, so > we won't break any existing users if java15 is set as the minimum. > > Pros for java15 as minimum in commons-1.1: > * can have EnumConverter > * internal code can be cleaner > * ??? > > Cons: > * some users stuck on JSF1.1 + java14 might not be able to use the new lib. > * ??? > > Anyone else got pros/cons? I can't think of anything particularly > convincing either way.. > Pros: * can have DateRestrictValidator I'll go with java15 as minimum for commons. > Regards, > Simon > >