IMHO configuring the logger has to be solved by the used container. Ciao, Mario
Von: Simon Lessard [mailto:simon.lessar...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 16:57 An: MyFaces Development Betreff: Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0 +1 for jul. However, I think we should add an utility class (ServletContextListnener? This is the easiest way I know of, if it qualifies for easiest at all) in myfaces-shared or extension to make it easier to configure the logger because it's way more annoying to configure than commons-logging backed with log4j imho. Regards, ~ Simon On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at<mailto:ma...@ops.co.at>> wrote: +1 for jul reduces dependencies - and sun also use it, no? Von: Leonardo Uribe [mailto:lu4...@gmail.com<mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 04:06 An: MyFaces Development Betreff: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0 Hi Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this form: protected final static Logger log = Logger.getLogger("facelets.viewhandler"); But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if there is no agreement about use jul, we should unify logging code using commons-logging). It is necessary to unify in one way or another the code of 2.0.x branch, but before that, it is necessary to ask the community about this issue. So, please vote in this way: +1 for jul +1 for commons-logging +0 -1 and let the code as is (and a reason why). regards, Leonardo Uribe
