Hi Just for your information, there are two topics to be addressed on myfaces core 2.0 brach related to Resource Handling api:
1. How to set headers for resource requests and 2. The problem with resources and EL expressions. There are some discussion on jcp open list, but this two does not appear at first view reading the spec. regards Leonardo Uribe 2009/10/16 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > quick comment inside > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Martin Kočí <martin.k...@aura.cz> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please review simple patch > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1596. > > > > More question about Resource support in trinidad2: > > > > 1) JSF 2 introduced "name" and "library" as an alternative to "src", > > "image" or "icon" for example. According to tag library documentation > > there is support only on h:graphicImage, but surprisingly it works with > > h:commandButton too (and maybe other). > > > > Should trinidad support name and library with tr:image (an alternative > > to h:graphicImage)? > > > > If a component has exactly one image attribute ("icon" in trinidad) > > interpret name/library as alternative to it ? I think "name" and > > "library" are too generic - they should be named "iconName" and > > "iconLibrary" or something like that. > > > > Folowing components have icon attribute: > > CoreInputListOfValues > > CorePanelBox > > CorePanelHeader > > CorePanelPopup > > CoreShowDetailHeader > > CoreCommandButton > > CoreCommandNavigationItem > > CoreGoButton > > > > I dont really understand if name/library concept was intended for > > components without behaviour from 'resource' family like image or CSS. > > > > 2) HTML head section > > There are h:outputStylesheet and h:outputScript in JSF 2.0 . Both > > support name and library attrs too. If we will rework trinidad2 to > > Resource API is there any reason why add to trh:styleSheeet > > name/library support? > > I think trh: tags can remain for JSP/old application and without > > name/library attrs and for new trinidad2/Facelets based application > > users can use new tags from JSF 2.0 > > I need to go deeper into the research on Resource Handling, and > its impact on Trinidad. Will probably start on this by Monday.. > > One thing I noticed as well is that you have to target the location > (head/body). > Trinidad should not require the h:head/body; instead we should use the > head/body > section w/in the tr:document (which is basically using the head/body > tags from trh) > > -Matthias > > > > > Note: name/library are only a option to #{resource} implicit object. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >
