...and, of course, when you extend "old" Facelets classes, this is NOT supported.
However the JSF spec has provided a backdoor: ==> javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER for that you need to ship old Facelets. -Matthias On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > ... on the other hand, the EG says, that JSF2.0 RT can be used to > deploy a JSF1.2 based application. > Since Facelets was just some random proprietary framework, ignoring > the "old" Facelets DTD is I > think correct; > > Still it is IMO a bit lame. > > -Matthias > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: >> maybe I am conservative, but I doubt that it is a bug, to allow "old" >> facelets-based tag JARs. >> You are saying it is, right ? >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I agree with Jakob. >>> >>> Just a small comment, doing some black box tests between myfaces and ri I >>> notice long time ago that ri cannot read faces-config.xml without have >>> version 2.0 in that file. It seems they fix that but a side effect is what >>> we are seeing right now (facelets taglibs 1.1.x read). I think myfaces is >>> doing right and really ri is mixing the two config files by some unknown >>> reason. >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Leonardo Uribe >>> >>> 2010/2/9 Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> On my opinion you have to differentiate between 1.x taglibs and 2.0 >>>> taglibs in some way, because MyFaces cannot know if this taglib will or >>>> won't run. If you can ensure that your 1.x-taglib runs with facelets 2.0 >>>> you >>>> simply have to add version="2.0" to your taglib and it will function >>>> properly. >>>> >>>> This is also specified in the spec (although completely hidden in the >>>> appendix): take a look at the xsd type definition of >>>> facelet-taglib-versionType. It says "This type contains the recognized >>>> versions of facelet-taglib supported." and "2.0" is the only allowed value >>>> for this attribute. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Jakob >>>> >>>> 2010/2/9 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> >>>>> >>>>> Deplyoing very simple JARs, like: >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12435313/MyFaces_Test.jar >>>>> >>>>> should work, out of the box. Doesn't the spec explicitly talk about this >>>>> for backward compatibility? >>>>> Sure, when you extend the "old" Facelets classes, you have to have it >>>>> deployed >>>>> as well (and there is some parameter to disable Facelets2) >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Matthias Wessendorf >>>>> >>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
