On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 6:26 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: > Many Facelets taglibs don't use Facelets tag handlers, > but simply wrap some xhtml templates. Nothing will stop these libraries to > work with MyFaces if we allow old version taglibs. > If we insist on refusing them people will simply switch to Mojarra to get > their application to run.
I know; that's what I meant with my comment before > The argument of a xsd:restriction in the spec will > help little. Just > taking old Facelets is *not* a solution, because the > rest of the application may want to use the new features. > Please try filing this as a bug to Mojarra as Matthias > proposed - if they fix it, MyFaces may insist on version=2.0, but if they > don't I think we shouldn't > either. I agree > I've carried the question whether a JSF 2.0 compatible implementation is > required to refuse old version facelets taglibs into the EG - let's see, > what they have to say technically, I think now we are correct. @Jakob: Did you create such a bug against the RI ? (that they allow "old" Facelets) maybe another on not being (too) clear in the spec about it... -Matthias > on this ... > > Best regards, > Ganesh >> >> I see both ways; I think I don't like the fact that the RI has this "bug" >> :) >> So, end of the story is, almost everybody will blame this to us ;-) >> "Oh, crappy MyFaces doesn't work" etc :) All the FUD! :) > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
