Re: [Trinidad][Skinning][API] move to api -> org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider

[Jeanne Waldman]

I created a JIRA issue for this. I initially planned to change the package from org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.share.io.InputStreamProvider Currently there is no "share.io" package in the API. There is no 'io' package either. I can: 1. create an io package 2. create a share.io package to mimic the impl directory structure, though I don't know why it is 'share'. thoughts? I'm leaning towards #2 to keep them in parallel. Jeanne Catalin Kormos wrote, On 3/3/2010 1:50 AM PT: +1 On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mwessend...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 Sent from my iPod. On 03.03.2010, at 01:41, Jeanne Waldman <jeanne.wald...@oracle.com> wrote: Hi there, I want to make sure it is ok for people if I move org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.share.io.InputStreamProvider to the trinidad package, making InputStreamProvider a public api. It should be very easy to do, since this interface does not use any other internal apis. We have a customer that wants to implement this interface so that they can use their own InputStreamProvider to find the skinning css files. This is a part of the TRINIDAD-1729 JIRA issue that I'm working on - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1729 Thanks, Jeanne -- ------------ Codebeat www.codebeat.ro