I'm with Werner here. If there's an encoding issue (in the distribution, not
the test code) I think doing a release will upset a lot of users.

So I'm -1 until we know what causes the test failure...

I'm gonna take a look at the failing test, but since I don't have any test
failures, I'm not sure my effort will be very useful.

/JK


2010/4/15 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>

> Before I am giving my vote here, there is still a unit test failure ...
>
>
> Am 15.04.10 06:39, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> Thanks for running this
>>
>> Sent from my iPod.
>>
>> On 15.04.2010, at 03:48, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>  +1
>>>
>>> 2010/4/14 Leonardo Uribe < <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>lu4...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Hi,
>>>
>>>    I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.0 release of Apache
>>>    MyFaces core out.
>>>
>>>    Minor fixes were done since the latest proposed artifacts
>>>    (MYFACES-2658, MYFACES-2659 and MYFACES-2660), so we can
>>>    continue with the vote.
>>>
>>>    The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>>>
>>>    Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
>>>    1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.1 [1]
>>>    2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.0 [1]
>>>    3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-3 [1]
>>>
>>>    The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
>>>    [3] for binary and source packages).
>>>
>>>    The release notes could be found at [4].
>>>
>>>    Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
>>>    myfaces-api.
>>>
>>>    Please take a look at the "2.0.0" artifacts and vote!
>>>
>>>    Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three
>>>    +1 votes (see [3]).
>>>
>>>    ------------------------------------------------
>>>    [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>    [ ] +0
>>>    [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>    released,
>>>    and why..............
>>>    ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>    Thanks,
>>>    Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>>    [1]
>>>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>
>>>    [2]
>>>    <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>
>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>>    [3]
>>>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200binsrc<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>
>>>    [4]
>>>    <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>>
>>>    <
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>

Reply via email to