Again: it works on my machine.. And I guess you may have forgotten to rebuild shared too, because the test tests results of changes on shared.
But until this is really sorted out, my vote also is -1. Regards, Jakob 2010/4/15, Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>: > Ok here it goes officially -1 until we have resolved the issue upon > looking at the test, the test is ok and tests correctly, the code > causing the test fail is at fault. > > That should not happen for a release. > As I have posted in another mail I currently have to serve a customer > if no one else is able to fix it in between I will have a look late > in the afternoon. > > > Werner > > Am 15.04.10 07:37, schrieb Werner Punz: >> Before I am giving my vote here, there is still a unit test failure ... >> >> >> Am 15.04.10 06:39, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf: >>> +1 >>> >>> Thanks for running this >>> >>> Sent from my iPod. >>> >>> On 15.04.2010, at 03:48, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> 2010/4/14 Leonardo Uribe < <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>lu4...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.0 release of Apache >>>> MyFaces core out. >>>> >>>> Minor fixes were done since the latest proposed artifacts >>>> (MYFACES-2658, MYFACES-2659 and MYFACES-2660), so we can >>>> continue with the vote. >>>> >>>> The artifacts passed all TCK tests. >>>> >>>> Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: >>>> 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.1 [1] >>>> 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.0 [1] >>>> 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" v1.0.0-beta-3 [1] >>>> >>>> The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and >>>> [3] for binary and source packages). >>>> >>>> The release notes could be found at [4]. >>>> >>>> Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with >>>> myfaces-api. >>>> >>>> Please take a look at the "2.0.0" artifacts and vote! >>>> >>>> Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three >>>> +1 votes (see [3]). >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be >>>> released, >>>> and why.............. >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Leonardo Uribe >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200 >>>> >>>> [2] >>>> <http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes>http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >>>> >>>> [3] >>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces200binsrc>http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces200binsrc >>>> >>>> [4] >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890 >>>> >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12314890> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > > -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
