Hi I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
*This product includes software developed by: The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ See the file LICENSE.txt See licenses for accompanying products in the "/licenses" subdirectory. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This software also includes code from Facelets ( https://facelets.dev.java.net/) for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support. This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/). Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution under the CDDL license. You can obtain a copy of the License at: https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html The source code is available at: https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/ The following schemas are included: =========================== javaee_5.xsd javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd =========================== * If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts and start vote again. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate > (again) the artifacts. > > To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and > after that wait another 72 hours for release. > > > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> > >> The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue. >> And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote. >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting >> thread? >> >> >> >> By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long >> >> as they are appropriately documented. >> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b >> >> >> > >> > So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right? >> > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi >> >> > >> >> > Those files were copied from tomcat project: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/ >> >> > >> >> > There is no mention in NOTICE file there. >> >> > >> >> > regards, >> >> > >> >> > Leonardo Uribe >> >> > >> >> > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> >> >> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See: >> >> >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure. >> >> >> >> >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> >> Bernd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz < >> werner.p...@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL >> are >> >> >> > we >> >> >> > even >> >> >> > allowed to bundle them? >> >> >> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error >> made >> >> >> > on >> >> >> > Bernds side. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Werner >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Bernd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we >> can >> >> >> >> continue with the vote. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com >> >> >> >> <mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> here is my >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I found too many files without or old apache license header. >> >> >> >> j4fry is missing in the notice file. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The files >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd >> >> >> >> are cddl and are missing in the notice file >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the >> >> >> >> 2.0.1 >> >> >> >> branch. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Bernd >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg >> >> >> >> <strub...@yahoo.de >> >> >> >> <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to >> build >> >> >> >> them from the source distribution. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > LieGrue, >> >> >> >> > strub >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> >> >> >> >> > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1 >> >> >> >> > To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org >> >> >> >> <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>> >> >> >> >> > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of >> >> >> >> Apache >> >> >> >> > MyFaces core out. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The artifacts passed all TCK tests. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following >> >> >> >> parts: >> >> >> >> > 1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.shared" v4.0.2 >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > 2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v2.0.1 >> [1] >> >> >> >> > 3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test" >> >> >> >> v1.0.0-beta-4 >> >> >> >> [1] >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account >> ([1] >> >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> [3] for binary and source packages). >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > The release notes could be found at [4]. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities >> >> >> >> with >> >> >> >> myfaces-api. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts and vote! >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a >> minimum >> >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> three >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > +1 votes (see [3]). >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits >> >> >> >> > [ ] +0 >> >> >> >> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to >> be >> >> >> >> released, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > and why.............. >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> >> > Leonardo Uribe >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > [1] >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> >> >> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > [2] >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes >> >> >> >> > [3] >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc<http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> >> >> >> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > [4] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> < >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117 >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >
