Hi,

I was out for a bit, and was wondering if this vote has now been
officially stopped ?

Thanks!
Matthias

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> That's cool! Thanks!. After release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll propose a
> release of 2.0.1 again.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo
>
> 2010/6/16 Michael Concini <mconc...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Leonardo,
>> I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far as 2754 and
>> 2755 we should be good to go.
>>
>> -Mike
>> On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bernd
>>
>> Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps, because
>> there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but I'm not have
>> a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in progress,
>> TOMAHAWK....).
>>
>> We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 (checkstyle
>> version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this pom and we
>> don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point I have to
>> release myfaces master pom first.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Leonardo,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
>>> I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Bernd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Bernd
>>> >
>>> > I added in api:
>>> >
>>> > META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
>>> > META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
>>> > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >
>>> > in impl
>>> >
>>> > META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
>>> > META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >
>>> > because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
>>> >
>>> > The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent
>>> > misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
>>> >
>>> > regards,
>>> >
>>> > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >
>>> > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello Leonardo,
>>> >>
>>> >> looks ok for me.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can you also add in api
>>> >>
>>> >> META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >> META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >> META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >> META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >>
>>> >> and in impl
>>> >>
>>> >> META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
>>> >>
>>> >> an example would be
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
>>> >>
>>> >> I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
>>> >> afternoon.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >>
>>> >> Bernd
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This product includes software developed by:
>>> >> > The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> > See the file LICENSE.txt
>>> >> > See licenses for accompanying products in the "/licenses"
>>> >> > subdirectory.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This software also includes code from Facelets
>>> >> > (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
>>> >> > for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java
>>> >> > EE
>>> >> > reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
>>> >> > Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
>>> >> > under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
>>> >> >     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
>>> >> > The source code is available at:
>>> >> >     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The following schemas are included:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ===========================
>>> >> >   javaee_5.xsd
>>> >> >   javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
>>> >> > ===========================
>>> >> >
>>> >> > If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
>>> >> > artifacts and
>>> >> > start vote again.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > regards,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >
>>> >> > 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can
>>> >> >> regenerate
>>> >> >> (again) the artifacts.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote
>>> >> >> and
>>> >> >> after that wait another 72 hours for release.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
>>> >> >>> And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using
>>> >> >>> this vote.
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the
>>> >> >>> >> voting
>>> >> >>> >> thread?
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so
>>> >> >>> >> long
>>> >> >>> >> as they are appropriately documented.
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> > So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure,
>>> >> >>> > right?
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >>
>>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> >> <lu4...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> > Hi
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > Those files were copied from tomcat project:
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > regards,
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> > 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@atanion.com>
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> Hello,
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> Any suggestions?
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> Regards
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> Bernd
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
>>> >> >>> >> >> <werner.p...@gmail.com>
>>> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> >> > Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are
>>> >> >>> >> >> > CDDL
>>> >> >>> >> >> > are
>>> >> >>> >> >> > we
>>> >> >>> >> >> > even
>>> >> >>> >> >> > allowed to bundle them?
>>> >> >>> >> >> > Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an
>>> >> >>> >> >> > error
>>> >> >>> >> >> > made
>>> >> >>> >> >> > on
>>> >> >>> >> >> > Bernds side.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> > Werner
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> > Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Hi Bernd
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> so we
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> can
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> continue with the vote.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> regards,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> <mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com>>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    Hello,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    here is my
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    -1
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    I found too many files without or old apache license
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> header.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    j4fry is missing in the notice file.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    The files
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    are cddl and are missing in the notice file
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> and in
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> the
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> 2.0.1
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    branch.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    Regards
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    Bernd
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> <strub...@yahoo.de
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> able to
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> build
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    them from the source distribution.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > LieGrue,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > strub
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> <lu4...@gmail.com
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > From: Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> <mailto:lu4...@gmail.com>>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    <mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org>>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Hi,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> release of
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> Apache
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > MyFaces core out.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Please note that this vote concerns all of the
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> following
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> parts:
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >  1. Maven artifact group
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> "org.apache.myfaces.shared"
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> v4.0.2
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  [1]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >  2. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core"
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> v2.0.1
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  [1]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >  3. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.test"
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> v1.0.0-beta-4
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> [1]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> account
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> ([1]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> and
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    [3] for binary and source packages).
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > The release notes could be found at [4].
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Also the clirr test does not show binary
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> incompatibilities
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> with
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    myfaces-api.
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Please take a look at the "2.0.1" artifacts and
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> vote!
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> a
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> minimum
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> of
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> three
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > +1 votes (see [3]).
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> bits
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [ ] +0
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> not to
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> be
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    released,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >  and why..............
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > ------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Thanks,
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > Leonardo Uribe
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [2]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [3]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>    <http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     > [4]
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>  <http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600&styleName=Html&version=12315117>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>     >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >> >
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to