Hi Leo, After the integration, we can do that. I would like to have this too :)
Regards, Jakob 2010/8/17 Leonardo Uribe <lu4...@gmail.com> > Hi > > Good to know that. I'll take a look at this one. I would like to have a > test suite for flash scope and ajax stuff. > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2010/8/10 Martinconi Cosmin <cosmin.martinc...@codebeat.ro> > >> Hi, >> >> >> The GSoC program for this year is almost finished and I wanted to let you >> know about the progress and the current state of the "Automated webapp tests >> for MyFacescore and extensions", my project for this GSoC. >> >> You can follow the API and the implementation(SVN google code) on: >> >> - http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/AutomatedWebappTestsAPI >> - https://gsoc2010-automated-myfaces-tests.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/ >> >> The API that I have followed is the one from the wiki, including small >> changes like introducing "@Tester" and "@Assertable" instead of "@Inject" >> for the resource injection configuration. The "@Tester" will inject an >> WebappTester instance that will provide all required functionality, and >> "@Assertable" to inject proxy instances for assertions. >> >> Also an "@ConfigurationTestSuite" configuration was provided, where the >> user of the API can specify a list of configurations and the API will run >> the test case with all the configs, meaning an "n" configured test case will >> generate "n" tests for the same test instance but with each of the specified >> configs. >> >> The API provides the following actions: click(buttonId), >> input(string).into(fieldId); and the assertions: >> assertThat(methodCall/ELexpression).is(Object).before/after(PhaseId) and >> expectCall(methodCall/ELexpression).in(PhaseId) >> >> I am currently working on some issues regarding expectCall() that I >> overlooked, but this should be functional by the end of this week. Other >> drawbacks of the project are that I couldn't get rid of the method: >> >> @Deployment >> public static Archive<?> createDeployment() { >> return webappTestCase.createArchive(null); >> } >> >> Arquillian is looking for a method annotated with @Deployment and if such >> a method is not provided it fails the test run. Another inconvenience is >> that, for the embaded Tomcat container, Arquillian requires, for now, a >> servlet mapping in the web.xml of the testing webapp, like: >> >> <servlet> >> <servlet-name>ServletTestRunner</servlet-name> >> >> <servlet-class>org.apache.myfaces.test.webapp.api.runner.WebappServletTestRunner</servlet-class> >> </servlet> >> <servlet-mapping> >> <servlet-name>ServletTestRunner</servlet-name> >> <url-pattern>/ArquillianServletRunner</url-pattern> >> </servlet-mapping> >> >> I would highly appreciate any feedback, comments or suggestions on the >> project and the implementation. >> >> Regards, >> Cosmin >> > > -- Jakob Korherr blog: http://www.jakobk.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr work: http://www.irian.at
