Hi,

on tomcat 7 it works (I just had to add MyFaces 1.2.9 and JSTL 1.2 to
the demo WAR file).
I want to try JBoss AS5, but jboss.org is currently down.

I gave Stan silvert a heads up on this issue as well (he thought that
Tomcat 7 may have
the same issue - but it works in beta-5)

-Matthias

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Christian Kaltepoth
<christ...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
> As far as I know the schemaLocation attribute must always contain the
> namespace and the location of the XSD file. Specifying only the
> location of the XSD is wrong in my option as it is not clear for which
> namespace the XSD is (without downloading it of cause).
>
> But I might be wrong. I didn't find the correct section in the spec yet! :-)
>
> Christian
>
> 2011/1/10 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>:
>> meh...
>>
>> 19:22:49,086 WARN  [SaxJBossXBParser] SchemaLocation: schemaLocation
>> value = 'http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd'
>> must have even number of URI's. @
>> vfs:///home/matzew/JBoss6/jboss-6.0.0.Final/server/default/deploy/trinidad-demo-1.2.14.war/WEB-INF/lib/trinidad-impl-1.2.14.jar/META-INF/tr.tld[1,238]
>> 19:22:49,102 WARN  [JBossEntityResolver] Trying to resolve systemId as
>> a non-file URL: http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee
>>
>>
>>
>> this sucks :)
>>
>> Question is... should the container resolve it, or is the current behavior 
>> OK...
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> looks like we are OK here.
>>>
>>> (currently downloading JBoss to check details early 2morrow)
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> It looks like the TLD starts with the correct namespaces
>>>>
>>>> <taglib xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee";
>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd";
>>>> version="2.1">
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  <display-name>Apache Trinidad Core</display-name>
>>>> .......................
>>>> .......................
>>>>
>>>> -Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> So basically JBoss' JavaEE 6 container is not backwards compatible to EE5.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are the URLs and elements outdated? Aren't say valid for JavaEE 5 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Christian Kaltepoth
>>>>> <christ...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although not being a team member I would like to add a comment on
>>>>>> this. I recently had major problems deploying some of the MyFaces
>>>>>> artifacts to the just released JBoss AS 6.0.0.Final. The problems were
>>>>>> caused by invalid TLD descriptors generated by the MyFaces Builder
>>>>>> Plugin. As far as I can tell the current trunk of Trinidad for JSF 1.2
>>>>>> is also affected by this. Perhaps it would be a good idea if somebody
>>>>>> of the Trinidad team takes a look at this before starting the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please refer to the following Tomahawk issue for details:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1560
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1560
>>>>>> 2011/1/10, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've created a Trinidad 1.2.14 release candidate, with the following
>>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>> up for a vote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN source tag (r1057250):
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.14/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-013/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source release:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-013/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/1.2.14/trinidad-1.2.14-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>>>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Reply via email to