Hey, What do you exactly mean with style? The layout-style or the code-style? But sure, I can use any style I guess.
I still need to commit the first version, but it's hard to dedicate time to this stuff, since it's not work related for me, but I'm gonna commit it this/next week, even though it's far from finished and doesn't yet conform to my personal quality standards. But then at least it's committed. /JK 2011/2/3 Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > hi jan-kees, > > some weeks ago i extracted our basic style for our demos at apache-extras. > it would be great if the real-world example uses the myfaces-style as well. > btw. it might be a good idea to bundle the resources -> we could release it > and all demos just use it as dependency. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2010/11/28 David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> > > >> On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Dunno how this OWB config creeped in. I guess I copy pasted the wrong >> openwebbeans.properties into the project. It's empty now. >> >> CODI is also in now and I'm starting to use it, but since I have been a >> bit CODI-ignorant lately, I guess I'm not using it to it's full extent. >> >> About Bean Validation, we could also use ExtVal in combination with BV to >> support more advanced use cases, but I'm not going to add it until I need >> it. When committed, anyone can add this stuff... >> >> About BVAL, I didn't use it because it's still incubating and I'm not >> looking forward to debugging all kinds of crazy integration issues. I want >> to keep focus on delivering an app and maybe afterwards migrate it to BVAL. >> What's the current state of the library? >> >> >> BVal works great in geronimo 3 and has been passing standalone tck for >> months and generally the in-geronimo tck issues have not been with bval but >> problems with other integrations such as OWB. >> >> For maximum portability (?) at least "officially" you might target the app >> to a javaee 6 web profile container which would include servlets, jsf, web >> beans, bean validation and ejb 3 lite already. Or you might try packaging >> it in two ways, one as a web profile app and one as a servlet app with all >> the extra support included in the war. >> >> david jencks >> >> >> BTW, it's not a *real* real-world app (it's not running in production for >> a client). I'm not allowed to do that. But it's more an example of how it >> could look like. >> >> Are you all okay with my idea to commit it into a sandbox? >> >> Regards, >> Jan-Kees >> >> 2010/11/27 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >> >>> big +1 for the real world app >>> >>> > useOwbSpecificXmlConfig=true >>> >>> This will be _completely_ removed from OWB in the very near future! This >>> has been the 'old' XML config from the original webbeans spec. >>> >>> I'd also suggest to use Apache bval instead of hibernate validator as >>> JSR-303 impl. This is also the default impl OpenJPA uses by in it's tests. >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> --- On Sat, 11/27/10, Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> From: Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>> Subject: Re: Real world MyFaces 2.0 webapp >>> To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> >>> Date: Saturday, November 27, 2010, 6:01 PM >>> >>> hi, >>> the "codi issue" you saw happens due to an owb config bug >>> (see org.apache.webbeans.useOwbSpecificXmlConfig=true) >>> imo we should just use portable features. >>> >>> >>> regards,gerhard >>> >>> http://www.irian.at >>> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>> Courses in English and German >>> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2010/11/27 Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> hi, >>> we could also use it for extval, codi,... tests. >>> regards,gerhard >>> >>> http://www.irian.at >>> >>> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>> >>> >>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>> Courses in English and German >>> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2010/11/27 Jan-Kees van Andel <jankeesvanan...@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hey folks, >>> Somewhere in the past I started working on a real world example webapp. I >>> guess it's already a year ago. :-) But now I have some free time to work on >>> this again. >>> >>> >>> >>> Currently I use MyFaces 2.0 (of course), OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA 2.0. I >>> also use Hibernate Validator. I got a strange error with CODI, so I skipped >>> it for now to stay up-to-speed, but I guess we should get that one in. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> My goal with this example app was to bridge the gap between the current >>> set of example apps and the real world issues that application developers >>> struggle with.It could also be a nice example of a joint effort between >>> multiple Apache projects, which would be good for the professional image of >>> Apache. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> So, this example app has a pretty big domain model, security, layered >>> architecture, etc. Also stuff like logging, caching and performance is being >>> taken care of, so people can compare their app with this one. And this app >>> can serve as a living documentation in which the answers to Frequently Asked >>> Questions can be found. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> 2 things:1 Since everybody has a different idea of what a "good" app >>> looks like, I expect a lot of discussions on the mailing list. But I think >>> this is a good thing, because those discussions are also valuable for >>> developers. Based on those discussions, they can choose the proper solution >>> for their context. Those discussions can for example be referenced from the >>> source code. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2 Where to put the code? My idea for now was to create a top level >>> "sandbox" directory within MyFaces because this clearly indicates that it's >>> a work in progress and outsiders shouldn't look at it yet. But then at least >>> it's in Apache version control. I can also put it into GoogleCode or GitHub, >>> but I prefer Apache, because I think more people will find it there. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Status:I currently have a working app with some pages. I want to write >>> some additional pages before I commit it. Of course every line of code may >>> be subject to discussion, but I prefer concrete discussions based on working >>> code. That's why I'd prefer a bigger initial commit, incl. a Wiki page with >>> architectural decisions etc. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Wdyt? >>> Regards,Jan-Kees >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
