I like it too. It doesn't roll of the tongue, but I can't think of something simpler and better.

Prakash Udupa wrote, On 4/13/2011 2:36 PM PT:
I think configurators are less likely to understand what a 'STYLE PROVIDER' means. So I like the simpler name Blake proposed 'org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.MAX_CACHED_SKINS'.

Thanks,
Prakash

On 4/13/2011 3:52 PM, Blake Sullivan wrote:
On 4/13/11 1:13 PM, Jeanne Waldman wrote:
Hi,
For this issue,  TRINIDAD-2026 memory leak in skinstyleprovider, I use  a least-recently-used-map instead of a HashMap so I can limit the number of skins that I cache.
This is useful if an application is built so that they have many skins, like if they have a skin per user, so that the numbe of cached skins doesn't keep growing and growing.
I default to size 20, but this is also configurable via a web.xml context-parameter.

Here are some proposed names:
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.NUMBER_OF_SKINS_CACHE_SIZE
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.SKIN_STYLE_PROVIDER_CACHE_SIZE
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.SKIN_STYLE_PROVIDER_LRU_CACHE_SIZE

in the patch it is org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.SKIN_STYLE_PROVIDER_CACHE_SIZE, so if I don't hear any objections, this is what I will use.

Thanks,
Jeanne

How about org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.skin.MAX_CACHED_SKINS?  SKIN_STYLE_PROVIDER_CACHE_SIZE is more specific and more technically correct, though.

-- Blake Sullivan

Reply via email to