+1 on a users mailing list, and I think David described it perfectly below.

Originally, I was for all support being on dev@, as pointed out in other mails, it is good for the project/code for developers to hear directly from the users. IMO The best way to make a project easy to use and work well, is to have developers do customer support: it appeals to both pride and laziness.

However, I think it can be intimidating to post to a dev@ list as a first time user, especially on something like an OS. We want to make that as easy as possible to get new users in. So, I'm for having a separate list, BUT I think anyone developing on the project should strongly consider joining that list and providing support. I certainly will be.

Also, I like the new mailing list archive -- we should definitely link to these on the doc pages.

Cheers,

Sterling

On 5/20/16 7:55 AM, David G. Simmons wrote:
As a n00b, I’ll chime in here with my experience so far … Just my $0.02, so 
take it as you will. I’ve been involved in a few ‘new’ 
product/protocol/platform development efforts over the years though.

As a new user and (potential) developer, the lack of a ‘user’ list was (as 
another has previously stated) a bit intimidating. I’m not (yet) a mynewt 
developer, just a hacker trying to get stuff working. I finally bit the bullet 
and posted to the dev list and was obviously pleasantly surprised by both the 
speed and friendliness of the response. There is a LOT of value in having the 
folks actually developing the system see all the questions from the users. I 
know it can be a distraction from the ‘real’ work to get silly questions from 
new users, but in my experience, the success of a platform is in many ways 
highly dependent on the experience of new users. If someone new can’t start 
using the platform, then you wont’ have new users, and …

I found the archives, and attempted to go through them as best I could in order 
to find answers to questions I was having initially. I figured most of them out 
on my own, from repeated trips through the docs, etc., but the email archives 
could be much more helpful. The problem is that the mail archives are … so 
1998. Not searchable, only navigable by year/month, etc. Having a proper 
interface to the mail archives would make them much more useful to users. Even 
the mail-archive.com interface — which has search — would work nicely. Having a 
forum — along the lines of phpBB2, though those are notoriously hard to keep 
spammers out of — with an email-to-forum gateway would also be helpful.

Back to hacking …

dg




On May 19, 2016, at 4:42 PM, James Pace <p...@runtime.io> wrote:

I’d personally like to see these separated. Many of the comments that are 
coming in are routine (though very informative) and do not inform the design or 
development of Apache Mynewt.

And, besides, it is likely that you will have “user” and “dev”  sourced to the 
same mailbox or mail filter!

On May 19, 2016, at 11:12, p...@wrada.com wrote:

I¹d prefer to keep them together for now.  As this is new, I think that
developers are going to learn a lot from the users issues or questions,
and vice versa.  I agree that this will get too much at some point, but
I¹m really getting a lot from seeing the user and developer issues
together.


On 5/19/16, 11:08 AM, "aditi hilbert" <ad...@runtime.io> wrote:

Hi,

With Mynewt attracting an increasing number of both users and developers
of various levels, it might make practical sense to have a users@ mailing
list separate from dev@ mailing list. That way support questions about
product usage, asks, needs etc can be separated from
developer/design/architecture discussions. Of course, there has to be
communication between the two groups to build truly useful and usable
features, but we can bring some organization to it with the separate
mailing lists. Please comment on the suggestion.

Let¹s keep this thread open through the weekend to gauge the general
response.

thanks,
aditi



--
David G. Simmons
(919) 534-5099
Web • Blog • Linkedin • Twitter • GitHub
/** Message digitally signed for security and authenticity.
  * If you cannot read the PGP.sig attachment, please go to
  * http://www.gnupg.com/ Secure your email!!!
  * Public key available at keyserver.pgp.com
**/
♺ This email uses 100% recycled electrons. Don't blow it by printing!

There are only 2 hard things in computer science: Cache invalidation, naming 
things, and off-by-one errors.


Reply via email to