This may have been brought up before but is there any talk about a python 
enabled NetBeans. My program at Dawson is planning to drop PHP because the job 
market demand here has dropped while requests for Python have increased. I know 
there is a plug-in but could it be more? I agree with continuing targeted 
NetBeans and having a PHP version. Then there is Go, Rust and for April Fools 
we will need a GW-Basic version. Extra points if you know what GW stands for.

Ken Fogel
Co-Chairperson and Co-Program Coordinater
Computer Science Technology
Dawson College
3040 Sherbrooke St. W
Westmount, Quebec
H3Z 1A4, Canada
Tel: 514-931-8731 x 4799
Twitter: @omniprof
________________________________
From: Josh Juneau <juneau...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2019 10:11 AM
To: dev@netbeans.apache.org
Cc: wadechand...@apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Frontend distro of NetBeans

I agree that a separate "lite" distribution would be useful for those who do 
not wish to deal with Java. I also agree with Wade that such a release should 
provide the option to automatically download and install a JRE distribution if 
one wishes to do so.

Around naming, it seems to make sense to continue to build off the Apache 
NetBeans brand, but perhaps create new "editions". I like something like 
"Apache NetBeans: PHP Edition", or something of the like.


Josh Juneau
juneau...@gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau

> On Apr 20, 2019, at 7:03 AM, Eric Barboni <sk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I would keep Apache NetBeans in the name, Apache PhpBeans looks like a TLP of 
> Apache not something from Apache NetBeans.
> And its misleading to existing Apache TPL like OpenWebBeans,XMLBeans.
>
> But making several branding sounds a good idea.
>
> Jenkins release build should be make more complex but this will not change 
> the vote and release except more file to sign and to review. It will be in 
> the convenience libraries part of the voting thread.
> For Apache Netbeans 12.0 we would have Apache NetBeans 12.0 "PhpBeans" at the 
> same time.
>
> The above link all the branding to official Apache NetBeans release to limit 
> effort.
>
> Best Regards
> Eric
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Wade Chandler <wadechand...@apache.org>
> Envoyé : samedi 20 avril 2019 13:08
> À : dev@netbeans.apache.org
> Objet : Re: [DISCUSS] Frontend distro of NetBeans
>
>> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019, 21:57 Geertjan Wielenga <geert...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think one of the coolest things we could do together is spin out a
>> separate distro specifically for PHP/JS type developers.
>>
>> We had that before, it only requires JRE, not JDK, and would mean the
>> potential for a small snappy editor-focused tool (that as a side
>> effect could be interesting for users of a few comparable editors we
>> can all think of).
>>
>> And that would bring in new contributions too since we’d be targeting
>> a different type of developer.
>>
>> What would need for this to be done and where? Probably something
>> would need to be tweaked on Jenkins?
>>
>
> This seems like a release build step.
>
> One thing though, would we want to do any special branding like a different 
> splash screen, icon, and name? Something like "WebBeans" (sounds like
> webbings) or could do some other things like "PhpBeans"/"PhBean"/"PhBeans"
> and "PyBeans"/"BeanPy"/"BeansPy" and "CBeans"/"SeaBeans"/"Beans++" or 
> "CyBeans" for C, C++, and Python or given all the Machine Learning bits at 
> Apache "MLBeans" with C, C++, Python, Java, and Groovy with some new wizards 
> for Spark and TensorFlow related items. Later with some of the new mobile and 
> native techs we could even have "MoBeans" (please).
>
> It would be handy if the installer offered to download and install a JDK for 
> the user as well from some where like AdoptOpenJDK. Those devs often don't 
> know about Java tools. And if we setup a JDK, and if they ever install any 
> Java, Groovy, or Gradle tools, then they'd be ready to work with them.
>
> I like the base idea plus all the play I think we can do like mentioned 
> above. I think for me personally I would rather focus on hardening, adding 
> features, and making more robust first, and then circle back, but laying some 
> foundation for it at the same time I think would be great; 
> names/branding/config steps etc/requirements from which to build features or 
> harden.
>
> Thanks
>
> Wade
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>

Reply via email to