> Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I > know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still..
The best time to object was on Thursday when I described the plan to vote in parallel: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ r2c456e2ae9cde981e2027c9ac65ec9e624405d7b052a13e4256f2f6f%40%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E I wrote: > Given another slip, we probably run our vote in parallel to speed things up. > We are short on time - GraalVM 20.3 was released yesterday and it is > missing its tooling. Every delay counts. It is my understanding that finishing source vote and only then starting vote on complementary binaries is not Apache policy, just a NetBeans project habit. John Mc wrote: > Votes on convenience binaries should surely wait to see if the parent > project vote passes imo We are certainly not going to finish the VSNetBeans vote sooner than parent one is over. As Martin wrote: > > I would like to release this convenience binary on VSCode Marketplace > > as soon as NetBeans 12.2 VC2 completes as well as this voting completes. Of course, few more `-1` like the one by John... John Mc wrote: > -1 ...and the VSNetBeans vote is over before the parent vote finishes. -jt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
