Hi Laszlo, It will probably be at the weekend when I can do the Mac installer. But yeah I've no problem doing it.
My main concern here and the reason for my -1 is that there seems to be a push for a convince binary without knowing if the main vote passes. If it doesn't then it's a waste of time and effort. Im also struggling with why this new sub project seems to be pushing forward and not liasing with the NetBeans RM for this release. Why are they pushing a separate timetable? Surely the creation of a timetable for it's release should come from the NetBeans RM? Granted someone in the community might do the last few steps but ultimately it's a NetBeans release... Regards John On Mon 23 Nov 2020, 21:49 Laszlo Kishalmi, <laszlo.kisha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I plan to close the VOTING round for 12.2 source Tomorrow morning > PST (That would be Tomorrow late afternoon in Europe). After that is out > I'd start a round for the Window and Linux binaries, also I'd ask John > to prepare the Mac binary. That would be the right time to start the VS > Code binary round, probably by then it won't be necessary to refer as > rc3 or voting candidate 2, as NetBeans 12.2 shall be considered as > released. > > Once the parallel votes have been collected, assuming that we could > prepare the website, the announcements can go out on the weekend. > > > On 11/23/20 1:01 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > >> Well, it would have been nicer to wait the close of the 12.2 vote. I > >> know it seems to be a matter of formality by now, but still.. > > The best time to object was on Thursday when I described the plan to > vote in > > parallel: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ > > r2c456e2ae9cde981e2027c9ac65ec9e624405d7b052a13e4256f2f6f%40% > 3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E > > > > I wrote: > >> Given another slip, we probably run our vote in parallel to speed > things up. > >> We are short on time - GraalVM 20.3 was released yesterday and it is > >> missing its tooling. Every delay counts. > > It is my understanding that finishing source vote and only then starting > vote > > on complementary binaries is not Apache policy, just a NetBeans project > habit. > > > > John Mc wrote: > >> Votes on convenience binaries should surely wait to see if the parent > >> project vote passes imo > > We are certainly not going to finish the VSNetBeans vote sooner than > parent one > > is over. As Martin wrote: > > > >>> I would like to release this convenience binary on VSCode Marketplace > >>> as soon as NetBeans 12.2 VC2 completes as well as this voting > completes. > > Of course, few more `-1` like the one by John... > > > > John Mc wrote: > >> -1 > > ...and the VSNetBeans vote is over before the parent vote finishes. > > -jt > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > >
