Probably the archetypes are open source and you'd provide pull requests to them.
Gj On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:37 PM Will Hartung <willhart...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:29 AM Geertjan Wielenga > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > There's so much we don't own. We integrate. Yes, that has disadvantages, > > but also the advantage that we can help users with actually existing, > e.g., > > Maven archetypes, rather than those made specifically for NetBeans. > > > > On the other hand, there's nothing stopping anyone from providing pull > > requests for any Maven archetype, including their own custom ones, e.g., > > there's a new Micronaut project template in the upcoming 12.4 using the > > publicly available Micronaut Maven archetype. > > > > Well if I were to fix some of the JEE wizards, how should I go about > publishing the archetypes? It just seems odd to me to have, perhaps, NB > specific archetypes outside of the NB project. > > Now, I could just update the wizards to not use the archetypes at all, and > code up the code generation internally. That, sorta, solves the problem, > but maybe that's not the best idea. I just wanted to more bring what we > have up to date. > > Regards, > > Will Hartung >
