On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:25 PM Neil C Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Multiple people have expressed massive reservations on this already. > Michael expressed a -0.99 already. Given code changes are really +1 > or -1 anyway, I'll lend the -0.01 until his and other reservations are > adequately considered at least.
I thought the objections were to frgraal, not to nb-javac. > And finally, what is the long term future of nb-javac and is its long > term development sustainable and responsive to our needs? Because > that can't be here, and it's not currently in the Oracle repository or > Maven namespace that was originally proposed here and to ASF legal > either. Yes, valid concerns. Especially now that the main promoter of this idea is now not at Oracle anymore. Gj > Best wishes, > > Neil > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
