On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 17:02, Michael Bien <mbie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 24.10.22 17:27, Ernie Rael wrote: > > The link to apache's guidelines for voting was clarifying for me. I'd > > like to see a more technical discussion. > > for me too, I withdrew the -1 vote the moment I realized that this could > qualify as veto since this discussion would fall into the code-change > category. > > Luckily withdrawing vetos is legal, which is useful since I didn't even > intend to veto anything :)
I would also point out that the link I shared strongly suggests using whole numbers in the code-change category, as the position expressed is boolean. It's why I said above I'm lending you a -0.01! :-) I don't think it's helpful to muddy the waters here. You're vetoing in all but name. I, for one, would like to see you and others moving to a neutral, if not positive, stance before I'd review my own. OTOH, I don't think this is all suited to technical discussion on individual code changes either, as there are also questions of broad direction of travel raised here that need to be reconciled. Best wishes, Neil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.apache.org For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
