This is the link to the presentation of Robert Scholte at Devoxx (half hour): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHTmFlVAyAc
> > Op 9 november 2017 om 9:00 schreef Dave Schoorl <dscho...@bkwi.nl>: > > That is correct. But please note, that a module name must be unique on > the module path. In order to prevent name collisions, you should provide a > propper name, probably containing a reverse DNS name like in packages. And if > it is something in maven central, I believe there are more restrictions, E.g. > regarding the groupId. I saw a presentation of Robert Scholte (maven > committer) at Devoxx yesterday explaining this stuff. > > To keep your module name unique, I propose to start it of with > org.apache.netbeans.html, like org.apache.netbeans.html.xhr4j. Or are there > other suggestions? > > I will try to make a pull request this weekend at the latest. > > Kind regards, > Dave > > > > > > Op 9 november 2017 om 7:53 schreef Anton Epple > > <toni.ep...@eppleton.de>: > > > > @Geertjan: All JARs are treated as automatic modules in Java 9, > > regardless of this entry in manifest. Only difference of manifest entry is > > that you can provide a proper name others can rely on. > > > > In absence of the manifest entry, the JPMS derives an automatic > > module name from the name of the jar stripping version numbers. Since the > > jar names are sensible in case of HTML-Java APIs (reverse domain), the > > module name will probably be correct. The automatic module name we put in > > manifest will make no difference as it’s the same string as the > > automatically derived one. > > > > That said, since all that is needed is to put a key in manifest, we > > should do that. This way it’s guaranteed to work, and we don’t need to test > > if automatic name is really correct :-). > > > > --Toni > > > > Am 09.11.17, 06:41 schrieb "Geertjan Wielenga" > > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com>: > > > > But Dave's idea of including Automatic-Module-Name would make > > HTML/Java API > > an automatic JDK 9 module ( > > http://blog.joda.org/2017/05/java-se-9-jpms-automatic-modules.html). > > > > Maybe a cool idea, what would the problem be, and maybe Dave should > > provide > > a pull request for this? > > > > Gj > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Jaroslav Tulach > > <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Dave, > > > I know little about desirable changes to target JDK9. However > > > if you want > > > to start development that would bring HTML/Java API closer to > > > JDK9, you are > > > more than welcomed. Of course, that would be for some future > > > release, not > > > 1.5.x. > > > -jt > > > > > > 2017-11-09 0:52 GMT+01:00 Dave Schoorl <dscho...@bkwi.nl>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should we not add Automatic-Module-Name attribute to > > > > the jar's manifests, > > > > now that Java9 is out? Especially since these files end > > > > up in public > > > > maven > > > > repo. > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Op 8 november 2017 om 20:40 schreef Jaroslav Tulach < > > > > jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > OK, the bits are now in > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/ > > > > netbeans/incubating-netbeans-html4j/ > > > > directory since revision 23014. > > > > > > > > Since revision 23015 the files are removed from the > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/netbeans/ > > > > directory. > > > > > > > > The release 1.5 is out! Time to prepare 1.5.1... > > > > -jt > > > > > > > > 2017-11-07 17:20 GMT+01:00 Bertrand Delacretaz > > > > <bdelacre...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Jaroslav Tulach > > > > > > > > <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > ...Does it still make sense to do official release of > > > > version 1.5 or can we skip that?... > > > > > > > > IIUC the only thing left is to move that release under > > > > /dist/release/incubator/netbeans - I think you should > > > > do it to > > > > demonstrate the complete process. > > > > > > > > If you don't expect people to use that release it's > > > > fine to avoid > > > > "advertising" it. > > > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
