I am not quite opposed to it (packing all git content), but that would mean we 
couldn't reasonably source-release a subset of the repository. E.g. just the 
platform.

Jan

13. ledna 2018 12:47:02 SEČ, Antonio <anto...@vieiro.net> napsal:
>Aha, so you mean downloading [1]?
>
>Look ma! No hands! That's clever!
>
>[1]
>curl -o netbeans-9.0-beta-rc1.zip 
>https://codeload.github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/zip/9.0-beta-rc1
>
>On 13/01/18 12:39, Neil C Smith wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 10:17 Geertjan Wielenga <
>> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think this is the most urgent task -- we need a new source ZIP
>>> (that's how artifacts are made available for review),
>>>
>> 
>> To clarify if the point in brackets was in reply to my question(?), I
>meant
>> why do we need to *build* a source zip?  ie. can we make it such that
>an
>> ant task isn't required, and the GitHub source zip / git command
>Matthias
>> used results in the correct output?  Having a git clone of the tag
>and the
>> source zip having different contents feels like a recipe for
>problems?
>> 
>> Best wishes,
>> 
>> Neil
>> 
>> 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
>For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

-- 
Odesláno z mého telefonu s Androidem pomocí pošty K-9 Mail. Omluvte prosím moji 
stručnost.

Reply via email to