Thanks Peter for clarification. Isnt it possible to have an apache update center, which includes only apache-netbeans-ide updates? Or is this incompatible with the apache release procedure?
> Badly worded by me, module update issue is where the update center will be > located > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:54 Oliver Rettig, <oliver.ret...@orat.de> wrote: > > > Phycologically people feel they have a more modern system if it updates > > > more frequently. There should be no reason why minor items can't be > > > released quickly in a more agile way. I suspect though we need to move > > > > out > > > > > of incubator status for that because there are a lot of rounds of > > > > approval > > > > > before code gets released. > > > You could have large core releases once or twice a year and many minor > > > updates imbetween. > > > > +1 > > > > > This is a personal thing but I would like to get the updates without > > > downloading a new version of the ide every time. Letting the ide auto > > > update would be nice. I guess that could only happen when the module > > > > update > > > > > issue is resolved > > > > Please point me to that module update issue? > > > > > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:24 Geertjan Wielenga, > > > > > > <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > Also, Apache NetBeans is more than Java-focused, and the question is > > > > also > > > > > > whether such prominence for Java should be given to the extent that > > > > the > > > > JDK > > > > releases should be followed at all, i.e., whether this should be an > > > > aim of > > > > > > the project. It's certainly open to discussion but definitely not a > > > > given. > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < > > > > > > > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Just as a quick FYI: Both JDK 9 and JDK 10 are supported in Apache > > > > > NetBeans 9, i.e., no, we've not skipped JDK 10. > > > > > > > > > > Gj > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Chuck Davis <cjgun...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> To me it makes sense to have NB reflect the level of Java > > > > implemented. > > > > > > >> For > > > > >> example, features of JDK 11 can be added incrementally to NB 9.1, > > > > 9.2, > >
