On Mon, 25 Mar 2019, 17:50 Matthias Bläsing, <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> wrote:
> whether we release 4 times from master or 2 times IMHO does not matter > much. What I tryed to say was: > > - release what is in master a point X > - in the release branch only do minimal bugfixing > Yes, this is exactly what was originally discussed in the initial thread on time-based releases that we seem to have lost. Two other things worth discussion IMO - in the original thread I think it was Jan suggested having merge windows, and only merging things outside of that that are bug fixes intended for the next release - keep cherry picking minimal. - in line with that, maybe the release branch could happen later in the process? Or at least kept in sync with master for longer? > I don't see capacity to develop 11.1 and 12 in parallel. > If we have any need for a 11.1 at all, surely bug fixes only off the release branch would be better? Best wishes, Neil >
