Doesn't this mean we could start moving towards 1.0 by keeping these UI changes isolated in an appropriate branch and make the completion of multitentant dataflow (and whatever other features) the complete marker?
If we need the UI in a distributable form, e.g. so that we can start gathering feedback, we can do that by having a 1.0.0-alpha or the like. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tony, > > That is correct. The UI redesign is necessary for a 1.0 feature. > Additionally, the UI changes are limited to styling and positioning of > certain elements for controlling the dataflow. > > Matt > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Matt, >> I'm not sure I followed. I think you said we have two things: >> A) ui redesign >> B) multi-tenant dataflow >> >> We need A before B, and B will be in 1.0, so we need A in a release before >> 1.0. >> >> >> Tony >> >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Matt Gilman <matt.c.gil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > One of the items that's needed to go over the 1.0 cliff is support for >> > multi-tenant dataflows. Scoping user authorization to portions of a >> > dataflow will require a major bump due to API changes and the like. Part >> of >> > the motivation for this UI redesign is laying the foundation for that >> > effort. Additionally, we'll get the added benefit of supporting a more >> > responsive layout and modernized look and feel in the meantime. >> > >> > Matt >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 to "UI redesign warrants a major version increment" >> > > >> > > I know that we're "pre 1.0", but this sounds like it's time to figure >> out >> > > what we need to include to go over that cliff. >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Looks great so far! >> > > > >> > > > I saw the target release of 0.6, which surprised me a bit. I would >> have >> > > > expected this significant of a change would warrant a major release >> > > > increment. >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Rob Moran <rmo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Greetings NiFi community, >> > > > > >> > > > > NIFI-1323 [1] has been mentioned in (at least one) previous thread. >> > In >> > > > case >> > > > > you are unaware, it involves beginning work on a series of UI >> > > > improvements. >> > > > > >> > > > > I'd like to point your attention to the wiki page [2] where you can >> > > read >> > > > up >> > > > > on factors that are driving this effort. >> > > > > >> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1323 >> > > > > [2] >> > > > > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Redesign+User+Interface >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Rob >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sean >> > > >> > >>
