Joe, Looking through the associated tickets, both sound like worthwhile additions and can hold off until those items get through reviews.
--Aldrin On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Aldrin, > > NIFI-1665 appears to correct a problematic behavior when pulling from > Kafka and when timeouts can occur. Definitely think we should get > this in the build. I also see that NIFI-1645 is up and given the > trouble that is causing for use of delimiter function we should engage > on this. > > Since you're working the windows build issue and these are in play do > you mind waiting a bit before sending the new RC ? > > Thanks > Joe > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Aldrin Piri <aldrinp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > > > It looks like the last ticket for 0.6.0 has been merged and resolved. > > > > I will begin the RC process shortly working off of commit > > 736896246cf021dbed31d4eb1e22e0755e4705f0 [1] [2]. > > > > [1] > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=736896246cf021dbed31d4eb1e22e0755e4705f0 > > [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/736896246cf021dbed31d4eb1e22e0755e4705f0 > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> The Locale issue was reviewed, confirmed as fixed by reporter and merged > >> in. > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Team, > >> > > >> > There are a couple finishing touches PRs to fix a big defect in > >> > SplitText for certain input types, improve locale handling and test > >> > behavior for Kit bundle, and to clean up content viewing from > >> > connections. > >> > > >> > Getting good input on findings folks have so please keep it coming as > >> > that helps ensure a solid/healthy RC. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Joe > >> > > >> > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Recommend https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1651 be > included > >> in > >> > > 0.6.0 > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Team, > >> > >> > >> > >> Ok sooo close. We have 5 tickets remaining. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Additional functionality/cleanup for SplitText [1] > >> > >> [status] Still in discussions. Recommend we move this change to > 0.7.0. > >> > >> Solid effort on both code contributor and reviewer side but this > is a > >> > >> tricky one. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Support Kerberos based authentication to REST API [2] > >> > >> [status] PR is in. Reviewing and PR tweaking appears active. Looks > >> > >> quite close and comments indicate great results. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Add Kerberos support to HBase processors [3] > >> > >> [status] Patch in. Under review. Running on live test system with > >> > >> great results. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Add support for Spring Context loaded processors (Spring > >> > >> Integrations, Camel, ...) [4] > >> > >> [status] Appears ready. Getting review feedback. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Zookeeper interaction for NiFI state management should limit > state > >> to > >> > >> 1MB [6] > >> > >> [status] Patch is in and review under way. Looks close. > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1118 > >> > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1274 > >> > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1488 > >> > >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1571 > >> > >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1626 > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Team, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Ok sooo close. We have 6 tickets remaining. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Additional functionality/cleanup for SplitText [1] > >> > >> > [status] Still in discussions. Recommend we move this change to > >> 0.7.0. > >> > >> > Solid effort on both code contributor and reviewer side but this > is > >> a > >> > >> > tricky one. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Support Kerberos based authentication to REST API [2] > >> > >> > [status] PR is in. Reviewing and PR tweaking appears active. > Looks > >> > >> > quite close and comments indicate great results. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Add Kerberos support to HBase processors [3] > >> > >> > [status] Patch in. Under review. Running on live test system > with > >> > >> > great results. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Add support for Spring Context loaded processors (Spring > >> > >> > Integrations, Camel, ...) [4] > >> > >> > [status] Appears ready. Getting review feedback. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Support based database snapshot/query/change capture [5] > >> > >> > [status] Appears ready. Needs review. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > - Zookeeper interaction for NiFI state management should limit > state > >> > to > >> > >> 1MB [6] > >> > >> > [status] Patch is in and review under way. Looks close. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1118 > >> > >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1274 > >> > >> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1488 > >> > >> > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1571 > >> > >> > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1575 > >> > >> > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1626 > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks > >> > >> > Joe > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Aldrin Piri < > aldrinp...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >> Sounds great. Will scope those out in the process. Thanks, > Tony. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Tony Kurc <trk...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >>> Aldrin, > >> > >> >>> I did some crappy shell scripts to help, I'll try to put those > up > >> on > >> > >> the > >> > >> >>> wiki. > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> Tony > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Aldrin Piri < > >> aldrinp...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> >>> > In an effort to avoid me missing helpers and spamming the > list, > >> I > >> > >> will > >> > >> >>> > throw my hat into the ring to do this one. > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Joe Witt < > joe.w...@gmail.com> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > > Team, > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > Seeing good progress today. Great! > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > I know I volunteered to do the RM for the release but now I > >> need > >> > >> to be > >> > >> >>> > > out of town and will have questionable Internet access. > Can > >> > >> someone > >> > >> >>> > > else grab it? > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > Thanks > >> > >> >>> > > Joe > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Joe Witt < > joe.w...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > > > Team, > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > Things are closing in well but we need to get pretty > >> specific > >> > on > >> > >> >>> these > >> > >> >>> > > > to keep the release moving roughly along the lines of the > >> > >> schedule > >> > >> >>> > > > we've discussed previously. Those of you who have > tickets > >> on > >> > >> here > >> > >> >>> > > > that can be moved to 0.7.0 please do so. Otherwise, > let's > >> > please > >> > >> >>> keep > >> > >> >>> > > > discussion/status information up so we can all see how > we're > >> > >> trending > >> > >> >>> > > > toward release candidate readiness. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > The current items on the release based on JIRA fix > version > >> > that > >> > >> >>> remain > >> > >> >>> > > are: > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Supporting a new JMS producer/consumer style [1] [2] > [3] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Great rounds of review with Oleg, Percivall, > Moser. > >> > >> Looks > >> > >> >>> > close. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Processors to interact with Apache Cassandra [4] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Looks ready but needing review. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Additional functionality/cleanup for SplitText [5] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Still in discussions. Recommend we move this > change > >> > to > >> > >> >>> 0.7.0. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Support Kerberos based authentication to REST API [6] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Update suggests it is almost ready. A suggested > key > >> > >> feature > >> > >> >>> > > > of this release. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Add Kerberos support to HBase processors [7] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Appears nearly ready. Great discussions and > group > >> > >> contribs. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Add support for Spring Context loaded processors > (Spring > >> > >> >>> > > > Integrations, Camel, ...) [8] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status]Appears ready. Needs review. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Support based database snapshot/query/change capture > [9] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status] Appears ready. Needs review. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Allow empty content posting w/o content type header > [10] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status] Discussions led to changing behavior a bit. > >> Possibly > >> > >> slide > >> > >> >>> > > > to 0.7.0 as an alternative approach exists for now. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Support Kinesis Firehose interaction [11] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status] Appears to be a candidate to slide to 0.7.0 > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Support Apache Spark 1.6 for Spark receiver [12] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status] Appears ready but needing review. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > - Support SSL with AMQP processors [13] > >> > >> >>> > > > [status] Appears ready but needs review as it adds to a > >> > commonly > >> > >> used > >> > >> >>> > > > SSL interface. > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-614 > >> > >> >>> > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1424 > >> > >> >>> > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1425 > >> > >> >>> > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-901 > >> > >> >>> > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1118 > >> > >> >>> > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1274 > >> > >> >>> > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1488 > >> > >> >>> > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1571 > >> > >> >>> > > > [9] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1575 > >> > >> >>> > > > [10] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1620 > >> > >> >>> > > > [11] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1495 > >> > >> >>> > > > [12] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1519 > >> > >> >>> > > > [13] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1521 > >> > >> >>> > > > > >> > >> >>> > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Joe Witt < > >> joe.w...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > > >> Have updated the migration guide [1] and release notes > [2] > >> > for > >> > >> >>> 0.6.0. > >> > >> >>> > > >> If there are features/inclusions will adjust as > needed. I > >> > >> intend to > >> > >> >>> > > >> follow a very similar RM model to what Tony did for the > >> 0.5.x > >> > >> line > >> > >> >>> and > >> > >> >>> > > >> which follows the apparent consensus from our recent Git > >> > >> >>> discussions. > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > >> We'll definitely need folks to really focus in on the > >> > existing > >> > >> JIRAs > >> > >> >>> > > >> slated for 0.6.0 and any necessary reviews or tweaks. > >> Early > >> > >> next > >> > >> >>> week > >> > >> >>> > > >> we should start moving tickets to the next minor (0.7.0) > >> > build > >> > >> that > >> > >> >>> > > >> aren't key bug fixes or aren't tied to previously stated > >> > 0.6.0 > >> > >> >>> goals. > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > >> [1] > >> > >> >>> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Migration+Guidance > >> > >> >>> > > >> [2] > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Release+Notes > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > >> Thanks > >> > >> >>> > > >> Joe > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> > >> >>> > > >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Tony Kurc < > >> trk...@gmail.com> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > > >>> Joe, > >> > >> >>> > > >>> I tagged this one that I've been closing in on, and was > >> just > >> > >> >>> > finishing > >> > >> >>> > > up. > >> > >> >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1481 > >> > >> >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Joe Witt < > >> > joew...@apache.org> > >> > >> >>> wrote: > >> > >> >>> > > >>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> Team, > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> It is time to start pulling in for the Apache NiFi > 0.6.0 > >> > >> release > >> > >> >>> to > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> keep with our previously suggested cadence. There are > >> > >> already a > >> > >> >>> lot > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> of really nice improvements/bug fixes on there and > some > >> > nice > >> > >> new > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> features. We do have about 23 outstanding JIRAs > assigned > >> > >> that are > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> open. > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> Most appear to be in great shape with active > discussion > >> > >> centered > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> around PRs with review feedback. Some just appear to > >> need > >> > the > >> > >> >>> final > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> push over the merge line. There are also some PRs on > >> > Github > >> > >> that > >> > >> >>> > may > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> well be in a ready state. > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> If there are things which are really important to > folks > >> > that > >> > >> they > >> > >> >>> do > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> not presently see on the 0.6.0 list but that they > really > >> > >> want/need > >> > >> >>> > and > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> think are ready or close to ready please advise. > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> I am happy to RM the release but if someone else is > >> > interested > >> > >> >>> > please > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> advise. Let's try to shoot for Mar 16th vote start > so we > >> > can > >> > >> be > >> > >> >>> > close > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> to the Mar 18th goal talked about a while ago on the > 6-12 > >> > >> month > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> roadmap proposal. > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> Thanks > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> Joe > >> > >> >>> > > >>>> > >> > >> >>> > > > >> > >> >>> > > >> > >> >>> > >> > >> > >> > > >> >
