I'd also like NIFI-4242 and NIFI-4181 added (or if it's OK, I can label their fix versions for 1.4.0. I wasn't sure sure I could do that, or if that should be left to PMC/Commiters)
NIFI-4242 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4242> has a patch with feedback, and I'll be pushing a new patch addressing the feedback later today. NIFI-4181 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4181> has a patch with feedback, and I'd like to address the feedback for 1.4.0 if possible. --Wes On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Currie <christop...@currie.com > wrote: > In addition to this list, I'd like to request that > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3950 also be added. I created a > PR for it, and I'm happy to work with a committer to clean it up for > project standards if needed. > > Christopher > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:44 AM James Wing <jvw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 It does seem to be about time to get a release out, and we should > > certainly take advantage of your offer to performing RM duties. Thank > you > > for that. > > > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > All, > > > > > > On the dev and users lists there have been some questions about when > the > > > next release of NiFi would be. I would like perform RM duties, and get > > > things started on identifying what the community would like to include > in > > > the release of NiFi 1.4.0 that has not already been reviewed and > > committed > > > to master. > > > > > > There are 11 unresolved JIRAs tagged with a fix version of 1.4.0. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > > > 3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > > > 20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority% > 20DESC%2C%20key%20DESC > > > > > > Are there any reasons to hold off on a 1.4.0 release? Are there > > particular > > > JIRAs that the community considers necessary to have as part of the > > > release? Let's discuss! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jeff > > > > > >
