Definitely agree with Brandon that due for a 1.4.0 and it has some really nice things in it....
Jeff Storck volunteered to RM. Jeff you still good? Anything I can help with? Thanks Joe On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Brandon DeVries <b...@jhu.edu> wrote: > There are significant changes in 1.4.0 that I am actively waiting on... > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:25 PM Russell Bateman <r...@windofkeltia.com> > wrote: > >> I don't know. Are we due for a release? Is time-since the significant >> factor in a release cycle or is growing features part of it? >> >> 1.3.0 subsists with no bump of the third digit. This is an oddly stable >> .0 product (though the third digit had somewhat different semantics in >> NiFi 0.x). No bug fixes to 1.3.0 in its roughly 6-month history? That's >> an achievement. >> >> If there have been important features worked on and ready to go, by all >> means, let's have 1.4.0. But if 1.4.0 is little more than 1.3.1, let's >> rethink why we'd do that. >> >> Russ >> >> >> On 09/18/2017 12:08 PM, Brandon DeVries wrote: >> > +1, it seems like we're do for a release. It's been a week, and a couple >> > of the mentioned tickets have shown progress... but a number haven't. If >> > no one wants to get them wrapped up, can we put them off to 1.5? >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM Wes Lawrence <wesleyll...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> I'd also like NIFI-4242 and NIFI-4181 added (or if it's OK, I can label >> >> their fix versions for 1.4.0. I wasn't sure sure I could do that, or if >> >> that should be left to PMC/Commiters) >> >> >> >> NIFI-4242 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4242> has a patch >> >> with feedback, and I'll be pushing a new patch addressing the feedback >> >> later today. >> >> NIFI-4181 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4181> has a patch >> >> with feedback, and I'd like to address the feedback for 1.4.0 if >> possible. >> >> >> >> --Wes >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Currie < >> >> christop...@currie.com >> >>> wrote: >> >>> In addition to this list, I'd like to request that >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3950 also be added. I >> >> created a >> >>> PR for it, and I'm happy to work with a committer to clean it up for >> >>> project standards if needed. >> >>> >> >>> Christopher >> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:44 AM James Wing <jvw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> +1 It does seem to be about time to get a release out, and we should >> >>>> certainly take advantage of your offer to performing RM duties. Thank >> >>> you >> >>>> for that. >> >>>> >> >>>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> All, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On the dev and users lists there have been some questions about when >> >>> the >> >>>>> next release of NiFi would be. I would like perform RM duties, and >> >> get >> >>>>> things started on identifying what the community would like to >> >> include >> >>> in >> >>>>> the release of NiFi 1.4.0 that has not already been reviewed and >> >>>> committed >> >>>>> to master. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> There are 11 unresolved JIRAs tagged with a fix version of 1.4.0. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >> >>>>> 3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% >> >>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority% >> >>> 20DESC%2C%20key%20DESC >> >>>>> Are there any reasons to hold off on a 1.4.0 release? Are there >> >>>> particular >> >>>>> JIRAs that the community considers necessary to have as part of the >> >>>>> release? Let's discuss! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks, >> >>>>> Jeff >> >>>>> >> >>
