There are significant changes in 1.4.0 that I am actively waiting on... On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 2:25 PM Russell Bateman <r...@windofkeltia.com> wrote:
> I don't know. Are we due for a release? Is time-since the significant > factor in a release cycle or is growing features part of it? > > 1.3.0 subsists with no bump of the third digit. This is an oddly stable > .0 product (though the third digit had somewhat different semantics in > NiFi 0.x). No bug fixes to 1.3.0 in its roughly 6-month history? That's > an achievement. > > If there have been important features worked on and ready to go, by all > means, let's have 1.4.0. But if 1.4.0 is little more than 1.3.1, let's > rethink why we'd do that. > > Russ > > > On 09/18/2017 12:08 PM, Brandon DeVries wrote: > > +1, it seems like we're do for a release. It's been a week, and a couple > > of the mentioned tickets have shown progress... but a number haven't. If > > no one wants to get them wrapped up, can we put them off to 1.5? > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:39 AM Wes Lawrence <wesleyll...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I'd also like NIFI-4242 and NIFI-4181 added (or if it's OK, I can label > >> their fix versions for 1.4.0. I wasn't sure sure I could do that, or if > >> that should be left to PMC/Commiters) > >> > >> NIFI-4242 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4242> has a patch > >> with feedback, and I'll be pushing a new patch addressing the feedback > >> later today. > >> NIFI-4181 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4181> has a patch > >> with feedback, and I'd like to address the feedback for 1.4.0 if > possible. > >> > >> --Wes > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Christopher Currie < > >> christop...@currie.com > >>> wrote: > >>> In addition to this list, I'd like to request that > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3950 also be added. I > >> created a > >>> PR for it, and I'm happy to work with a committer to clean it up for > >>> project standards if needed. > >>> > >>> Christopher > >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:44 AM James Wing <jvw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 It does seem to be about time to get a release out, and we should > >>>> certainly take advantage of your offer to performing RM duties. Thank > >>> you > >>>> for that. > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Jeff <jtsw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> All, > >>>>> > >>>>> On the dev and users lists there have been some questions about when > >>> the > >>>>> next release of NiFi would be. I would like perform RM duties, and > >> get > >>>>> things started on identifying what the community would like to > >> include > >>> in > >>>>> the release of NiFi 1.4.0 that has not already been reviewed and > >>>> committed > >>>>> to master. > >>>>> > >>>>> There are 11 unresolved JIRAs tagged with a fix version of 1.4.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >>>>> 3D%20NIFI%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND% > >>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%201.4.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority% > >>> 20DESC%2C%20key%20DESC > >>>>> Are there any reasons to hold off on a 1.4.0 release? Are there > >>>> particular > >>>>> JIRAs that the community considers necessary to have as part of the > >>>>> release? Let's discuss! > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Jeff > >>>>> > >
