Hi, The number of open PRs is still growing and it could make think people that the project is not healthy/active (even though a quick look at the last commit date or the commits rate is a clear indication that the project is healthy).
In order to encourage people to review code and keep active discussions on the PRs, I suggest to find a way to keep this number as small as possible. To do so, I'd like to ask the wider community if the approach taken by a project like Apache Beam would be a good idea: "A pull request becomes stale after its author fails to respond to actionable comments for 60 days. Author of a closed pull request is welcome to reopen the same pull request again in the future." This approach is managed by a file [1] in the .github directory of the repository. What do you think about this approach? [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.github/stale.yml Pierre
